Voto:
Sure. Today, giants who self-pump each other and then get offended if you point it out. The same mental stability as a kindergarten. Ah. For precision, at luludiamojorosaluna, also add the hilarious absurdino.
Voto:
For example @[G], and it's not to be mistaken as an attack on the user Buzzin, without commenting on the preference for the style and content of this writing, this is not a review. It consists of a few lines, lacking any minimal effort that could provide us with information of any kind. It’s a repetitive stylistic exercise; it would be better to just put the link in the listening sessions (which Buzzin does consistently, even proposing very nice things). Indeed, you could copy and paste this and apply it arbitrarily to any other work. Then I see that this thing is very much liked, a flood of approval in the face of those who actually review. I’m totally fine with that, de gustibus... but for me, it would go directly into the area dedicated to de-finitions. A little ingenuity, damn it. Buzzin, it’s not "animosity," it’s something I already said long ago. In fact, I don’t even rate it.
Soen Lykaia
9 feb 17
Voto:
they had already made me shit the album debut brought back to the store on the spot. Embarrassing and inappropriate the comparisons with Tool or Opeth. Let's keep our distance.
Voto:
For some intelligent and concise reflections on the subject, I refer to the review by the excellent @[MikiNigagi] No Waves - Body/Head - Recensione di MikiNigagi
Don't take it personally MrGMauro, yours would be a terrible editorial, a hundred lines to discover hot water.
And stop giving 5s to anything. Damn it.
Kairo Medioemo
31 jan 17
Voto:
emo is crap
Voto:
They quote each other, and one can even forgive them for it. Smooth reading, sharp analysis.
Voto:
Nice review. They never really grabbed me; they've always left me with a sense of predictability. Almost "textbook" ... who knows.
Voto:
I usually don't appreciate reviews of individual tracks. However, it's a good opportunity to talk about the band, in a fluent analysis that I also agree with.
Voto:
When content and quotes travel at the highest levels, it can only be a five :-)
Voto:
interesting report