@Marpado, I've read the various comments; I identify with some, and less with others. As for the gratuitous insults, as you may have already understood, NO (see what
@Primiballi wrote in post 149). I want to make a premise before I come across as something I don't want to be and that I'm not: I like Vasco and I truly loved him up until the album "Nessun pericolo per te," which includes up to 1996. From then on, I bought all the albums... but alas, I've lost a bit (a lot) of my enthusiasm. So I'll say this now and won't repeat myself: I detest those who listen to music with blinders on; thus, I detest those who claim that everything that isn't Vasco is crap a priori, just as I don't appreciate those who assert that everything about Vasco is crap. For me, there are no extremes; Vasco is not a role model, he's not "like a father" as some claim. I would say he has been more of a soundtrack that accompanied episodes of my life, and I have always liked the catchiness (forgive the term) of his music more than "Mr. Vasco Rossi" himself, with all the myths and omnipotence attributed to him. So please don’t misunderstand me and don’t tell me that I have prejudices because that's not the case. If a song sucks for me, that's just how it is, regardless of who performs it.
That said, let's go in order; I'll give you my very modest opinion regarding what I've read in the comments about "Basta poco," which concerns Vasco seen as a whole more than the specific little song in question, so refer to that review.
Post
#27... Claiming that Liga is better than Vasco seems to me a somewhat bold statement. Vasco, if nothing else, has always surrounded himself with amazing musicians (see Stef Burns in recent years), while Ligabue's guitarist could be someone like me.
Post
#30... In my opinion, Vasco was an appreciable singer-songwriter up until '96... after that, it would be foolish not to confirm the decline in style. Many times the comments are driven by hate rather than reason.
Post
#50... Good
@Primiballi has written sensible things; if Vasco were evaluated as a whole and not just for the last works, many would change their opinion...
Regarding post
#52, it annoys me not so much for the questionable content (like comparisons to Djfrancesco...Taricone, Costantino WHAT THE F*** IS THIS GUY WRITING???), but for the way of pointing fingers at an artist who I’m almost sure doesn’t even know who he is (beyond the usual four little songs) and against a group of people who shouldn't necessarily be judged as sheep or idiots just because they go to his concert or buy his album. The big problem, as usual, is the large prejudices; it’s too easy to insult without sensibly justifying the reason for the insult... I repeat SENSIBLY, not making comparisons that go beyond all logic. Let's comment on some objective bases for once! If you want to trash "basta poco," go ahead; if you want to burn the last album too... but Vasco is (thankfully) not just this... in post
#54, it says more or less the same thing: you need to argue, not insult! Post
#56 then said everything else.
I'm saddened that even good
@Stoney used the same words in post #110; I think the hate he feels towards Vasco in this case has blinded his use of reason and prevented him from sensibly evaluating the "Vasco phenomenon" in Italy. However, I appreciated his post #160, even though I wouldn’t compare the writing styles of De André or Guccini (whom I adore both) to that of Vasco. I believe they are different ways of presenting their music. A Guccini text is poetry; a Vasco text is, in the vast majority of cases, a kind of message to be interpreted, where the musical impact prevails over the words.
Or his #162 where he talks about a band that, in my opinion, has also produced a spectacular album!!! (I wouldn’t take anything away from "2020 speedball" or "Storie per vivere" even if they're clearly more immature). My thought can be associated with that of good
@GustavoTanz in post #142, in the se