telespallabob

Video Rai.TV - Presa Diretta 2010 - La Giustizia - Presa Diretta Last week's episode on Justice from PresaDiretta. Far from the vanity of judges. It just takes a capable editorial team to understand what the problems are. I'm going to watch some Rugby; at least there common sense still exists.

Galli della Loggia has always been a supporter of a "modern European right," mentioning (and so do other commentators) the German CDU time and again, with a touch of Mr. Bruni (Sarkozy), which never hurts. Not coincidentally, he wrote a critical editorial about the PDL and was censored, a behavior typical of a center-left newspaper. As for what he did in the '70s, I couldn't care less, just as I couldn't care less about what Ostellino did 25 years ago, who now writes very different things. But if you are still stuck on the idea of "they're fake progressives and liberals; they're the same communists as always," copyright Mr. B, that's certainly not my fault. Oh, one little thing. "Never voted for Forza Italia," who cares! If someone spouts nonsense, I'll tell them, and this time I want to be direct and frank. Unfortunately for you, I am usually much more accommodating. A piece of advice: change your personal image, it really sucks.

You’re talking nonsense. I say it and I reiterate it! A director alone CANNOT DECIDE the editorial line of the best-selling newspaper in Italy. That is, the Corriere. A newspaper historically linked to the Milanese bourgeoisie and the circles of Confindustria. With its ideas but not expressly partisan. Mieli, the only time he openly aligned with the center-left was in an editorial in 2006 where he wrote that HE, Paolo Mieli, would vote for Prodi’s coalition. A simple voting declaration that in the U.S. directors of publications are accustomed to making. However, this did not change the editorial line of the Corriere, which has NEVER been center-left; indeed, it has always leaned towards “conservative” positions because it is historically a reference for the economic and social circles of Milano Bene. The circulation of Il Foglio? I don’t know and I’m not interested, but I’ll report your exact words: "Tutte le maggiori testate giornalistiche italiane sono da decenni orientate verso il centro-sinistra." You said ALL. Since you know Ferrara better than I do, ask him if his newspaper is center-left. The only ones I’ve seen read "Il Foglio" are all from CL (Comunione e Liberazione), and I don’t believe they are center-left. I might be arrogant this time, but you’re just spouting nonsense.

"All the major Italian newspapers have been leaning towards the center-left for decades. Even the Corriere della Sera, over the last 30 years, has had directors from the center-left or from the extreme left. Paolo Mieli, to give just a tiny example, was a militant of Potere Operaio and Lotta Continua. One question only: will you stop saying nonsense that then you start believing the crap he says? I'll give you a very big example: Ferrara (the skinny one) was involved in that world of Lotta Continua when he was young (and also the mentioned Minzolini has a past of that kind, I don't remember which group of the extra-parliamentary left, but he definitely was active in that political sector). @Delorenzo, let's not joke around! Now I'll give you an example to help you understand the reasoning that has come to justify the "interpretative decree." Suppose I get a fine for speeding. There are 60 days to pay, and I go on the 61st day to the post office. Just outside the maximum time. By law, I should receive a penalty. I appeal saying, "Yes, I paid late, but I shouldn’t have to pay the penalty because the police prevented me from paying the fine!" Let's say I really do something like that — the judge would not only tell me I'm completely wrong, but he would also make me pay the legal costs. In short, I’d be in deep trouble! Nobody has understood the problem of this situation: here NO ONE prevented the PDL from participating in the elections. They simply submitted the list either after the deadline (in Rome) or with ILLEGAL signatures (in Milan). Nobody was stopping PDL militants from going to the polling station; if they didn’t find their party's symbol, it was the fault of their leaders who didn’t register for the elections. It's like: did you lose? That's your problem! You should have done things right before and maybe you would have won! I'll give you this advice too: stop saying nonsense! And I tell you this for your own good because when you reason, you've said something right: the problem isn’t Berluska. It’s the Italians who follow him! P.S. After the above comment, double five for solidarity."

The album pleasantly surprised me. Soon they will be passing through Brescia and I will be very happy to see them.

Let's move on to the answers. @Cornell, don’t think that the only victory is to "destroy the mafia." Contextualize the facts. The maxi-trial was a victory. Until a few years prior, certainly up to the murder of Boris Giuliano, a trial of that magnitude was simply unthinkable. No one would have imagined that they would build a dedicated structure to hold a trial (the bunker), that there could be a trial against the mafia as a "criminal association," and that this trial could actually succeed. The fact that since that time, anti-mafia organizations have emerged and continue to exist in various fields is an extraordinary achievement. "Rome wasn't built in a day," and neither would the mafia be defeated in a day. Falcone and Borsellino were well aware of this. Before the Palermo pool, fighting the mafia, with some support from civil society, was impossible. It seemed like an opponent that was simply untouchable, not even to destroy. You couldn’t even send ONE mafioso to jail. Now there are all the problems and setbacks of power, but at least the war against mafia organizations is being upheld and fought. That's no small feat. Let's move on to the second point. I repeat, the fact that you have to wait for a news program to tell you this is very serious. Some things should be taught right away; at least in my house, that’s how it was. I didn’t wait for a non-aligned newspaper to tell me. Explain to your daughter that voting is the end of individual freedom, teach her to nullify the ballot beforehand. And anyway, Falcone and Borsellino ARE extraordinary men, they live on in the ideas they promoted and in those who believe in them. @Geenoo. One interception isn’t enough, damn it! It helped him find Buscetta, that's fine. But if Buscetta hadn’t turned against the mafia, you wouldn’t have prosecuted EVEN ONE mafioso, not even Buscetta himself. Without the confession, you would have been right back to square one. An interception doesn’t send all mafiosi to trial and convict them! Was it an exaggeration? I’ll take it at face value; unfortunately, for these alleged sublimations, I’m slow. Isn’t it obvious that he’s just a magistrate doing his job? Obviousness is harmful.

"The spark of the maxi trial against the mafia by Falcone" the wiretaps? Since when? Wiretaps are an extremely useful tool, and they're used less often than one might think, but when we talk about an event like the maxi-trial we cannot overlook the revelations of Buscetta. Those opened the door to a new way of considering trials and witnesses in mafia cases, since there had already been collaborators, but it was with Buscetta that statements became evidence and a means to convict the mafia. And one. "How can a politician, a representative of the people, a man who swears on the State and the Constitution, attack anti-mafia efforts, the judiciary?" Don’t you know or are you afraid to say it? We know, everyone does. We just need the courage to say it out loud. And two. "This is a special person. He could change the course of events. He could save us. He could definitively cut off the head of the monster. He could make Italy reborn. He could redeem us. Make us smile, make us come out like on a sunny day. Ensure that our children can know what is good and what is evil." This passage is simply CHILLING. What is good and what is evil, you have to explain it to them as a parent, you have to tell them who Antonio Ingroia is or who else. The rebirth is not just for one, it is for everyone. We must all build it, not hope for a magistrate who can send the powerful of the moment to jail. Until we understand all of this, we are simply doomed. Ingroia (or Boccassini or any other magistrate in Italy) is not Saint George going to slay the dragon. Also because as long as we sit with popcorn in hand watching how it ends, we will always witness a victory of the "monster." This is not a matter of double irony, it deserves serious reflection because you have not understood the significance of certain battles. When I was explained who Falcone and Borsellino were, I was told they were extraordinary men, but to win they needed the support of all. Alone, they would never have succeeded. Beautiful review? Happy for you.

A really great film, enjoyable and well made.

This is some serious stuff! Great job!