telespallabob

Science does not aim to become a religion; the purpose of science is to help us understand reality in its countless areas and to allow us to live in the best way possible, utilizing its laws and the ingenuity of the human mind. It does not pretend to make people believe or align them at all costs to an idea. I believe the problem isn't religions per se; after all, anyone can believe in anything (ironically, it may seem more irrational to believe in a utopia than in a religion). The problem arises from the perverse uses made of them over the centuries and that continue to this day (the examples are endless; I mention one chilling and forgotten: the massacre of the Albigensians, which I have only seen mentioned once on TV during the Tour de France commentary in a stage passing through Albi, the site of that episode). Honestly, I believe that one should not become overly obsessed with religions; one should reason and live as they deem appropriate. In the event that there is a "god" who will judge humanity at the end of the world, they will be "put on trial." I am agnostic and defend my choice; after all, it is not important whether a higher entity exists or not. What matters is whether someone seeks to hinder your freedom in favor of others ("your freedom ends where mine begins," nothing could be more wrong) or in favor of a thought, whether right or wrong. Man is born free and should die free after a life where they were able to self-regulate and think for themselves. Sometimes the opposite happens, and for reasons that do not come from atheists, this must be stated. Unfortunately, religions are feared and respected to the extent that they deny the freedom of some. Once again, it is easy to remember when this is done in favor of Islam (see Oriana Fallaci's "followers") and forget when it is done for the Holy Roman Church. Regarding the book, Odifreddi is a clever and very likable character. This book is not one of my favorites; for certain "demonstrations," I prefer Richard Dawkins by a long shot.

Welcome to Debaser. Now let me explain the reason for this comedic delirium: realize that with yours we have reached 16 (and I mean 16!) reviews of this album (not counting the two for the singles). In short, we’re fed up with it. Next time, aim for something unheard, please. Let’s move on to the review, which is decent and a bit flat. In this case (of super-famous bands) don’t include the biographical notes.

My intention was not to attack you. I wrote those words because, in the end, certain words can have particular and dramatic meanings. The Armenian people have paid with blood for finding themselves under Turkish territory, time and again. Moreover, official historiography has never been concerned with holding such massacres accountable to the shame of humanity, repeatedly denying the genocide with the support of Turkey. In fact, even the most "open" Turks have rarely explicitly sided with the Armenians or spoken directly about such events. Only a few have had that courage. The memory of such dramas must endure; after all, it’s easy to remember some (foibe) and forget the Italian massacres against the Albanians and Montenegrins during World War II or the use of chemical weapons in Ethiopia.

Well done, a very interesting proposal. Side note: Turkish of Armenian descent... 100 years ago such words led to a genocide. Don't forget Armenian People.

Welcome to Debaser, you stole this one from me. A film that impressed me quite a bit, it deserves.

Personally, I am also connected to the old Anthrax; the review isn't bad.

You're great, I care about you. Recommended!

Rev probably overestimates everyone! :)

Between you and Supersoul, you make insecurities arise: it's not worth it!

Review and album too beautiful to be rated