Dr.Adder

The review is undoubtedly original. The writing can be divided into two parts and is "dichotomous" in certain respects. The first part presents, through a reasoning that is 50% debatable and 50% acceptable, the advantages/risks of downloading music. At this point, one might wonder what a copy is and especially what the original is. The second part of the writing presents the qualities of the reviewed album (album?). If the first part of the review (review?) is seen as an acceptable reasoning, the review could appear (in certain respects) as a strange ring. Conversely, if the first part is deemed debatable, the review (review?) could appear (in certain respects) as a strange imperfect ring. Therefore, the rating could be either 1 or 5. Since I currently do not feel qualified to rate the review (if the rating can truly hold any value in this context), what I can do is temporarily place it among my favorites, precisely for its "dual" meaning, even if slightly "ambiguous." The cover is mediocre as a subject, although good in terms of color choices. All of this, of course, in my opinion. Continuous greetings until the 48-hour deadline.

More than an excellent review, well done Tollani.
As for the album, I don't think it's my cup of tea.
Decent cover.
I wonder if it will arrive...(well! you know who!) for the five stars, just kidding!
Best Hip-Hop greetings (obviously periodical).

The review is fair, yet satisfying (in my opinion), rating 3.4.
I was almost about to get it, but since I was also "in the game" with a very rare mineral (Crocoite), I preferred to choose the latter; after all, these discs can always be found one way or another, while it's becoming increasingly difficult over time to recover the minerals.
Essential cover, maybe too much so.
Space greetings.

So... after a long and heated discussion in the jury room (time 25 min), the vote for the review was 4.6; I was for rounding up, while two other jurors were for rounding down. I had to "stun" them stealthily with the famous Vulcan move of Mr. Spock, so as to shift the decision to 5.
I also have Third, but it didn’t excite me that much; however, considering the beautiful cover and the excellent review (plus there’s also Ufoholdsworth), I’ll make a note of it.
Still, I always prefer R. Wyatt as a solo artist.
@paloz, they say there are always the same four "cats."
PS: @Giona, I’ve saved your review of the Gilgamesh among my favorites, also for the excellent cover.
Progressive regards.

Great artistic cover!
Well done, Panico.
Uhuhsalutihuhu.

More than a good cover, it looks like it came out of RE.
Gothic greetings.

Good job! I would even say a consistent good job, we needed S.Hillage! Then I'll go back calmly and read it all again.

So... I would like to clarify that both Paolo and Contemplazione, excluding the possibility that they might be the same person but at this point it doesn't matter, are what I have defined as cornerstone figures, but I meant Conte and Paolo, though not only them.
Furthermore, besides the cornerstone figures, there are also the foundations.
So I confirm my respect for Paolo and Conte, the former for his "simple" and familiar writing style, and I also add that from my first comment on one of his reviews, I remarked that his way of writing had a suspicion of Zen (in the good sense of the term).
If his writings are able to "accumulate" more comments, I don’t see that as a negative thing. His proposals are anyway valid and excellently presented; who can truly decide if a music or film product is valid or not?
We obviously can, but not only us, as we all have different tastes and there's nothing that can be done about that.
As for Conte, I genuinely appreciate his passion for Jazz (with a capital J, Conte), and I often notice in his reviews an almost "devilish" vibe for this musical genre.
….Drin!...Drin! Sorry, they are calling me from the control room....okay!
Here I’m being told (and I agree) that the term "buonismo" is frankly exaggerated.
Everyone here, some more (like Supersoul + others) and some less, are trying to expand this structure (made up of foundations, many cornerstone figures, floors, ceilings, and more; only the roof, I believe, will never be finished... perhaps fortunately).
Therefore, sympathy and respect, whether someone has written 100 reviews and made 2000 comments, or if someone has just arrived, apply to everyone (of course, hats off to those who have been here for a long time).
I also add, perhaps it’s my hope, that those with more "experience" not only in music should also have more "wisdom"; anyway, I echo Jake (another cornerstone figure).
All of this is of course just my opinion.
I greet all music enthusiasts with a periodic pat on the shoulder.
With affection, Dr. Adder.

Later the "dog" Adder will also come by to comment on Master Giona's review. One more "dog" never hurts. In the meantime, a greeting to everyone.

Well! At this point, after the notable effort and with all these reviews on this music genre, I would dare to call Tepes 'master' of metal.
Best (periodic) regards from Dr. Adder.