Dr.Adder

Grrrr! Hetzer, Chris Spedding....
Review in progressive reading.
So far it seems good.

Thanks also to the legendary shooting star and the indomitable 47 for stopping by these parts (virtually, I mean). A "salsato" greeting to you as well.

So, the review isn't bad, although in my opinion, it would have been better if you had avoided mentioning Gigi D'Alessio and Madonna in a review of Traffic. As a meta-analogy, it doesn’t seem very fitting. Review rating 3.4 (periodical). Album rating 3.3 (periodical). The cover is just decent; I think it could have been "elaborated" better. Regards, Folk-Rock.

Anyway, I pretty much agree with Giona's thoughts on the review. If you had reflected a bit more on your writing, it would have been better, not for any literary reason, but just for your personal satisfaction (as much as that may matter in such a context). After all, perhaps Iside is right when she writes that you should never take yourself too seriously... My vote, therefore, is also "connected" to the original proposal of this group. Regards, Folk.

So, review score 4.2 (periodical).
A good review.
I've never heard this album, although I'm familiar with the band from Midnight... nonetheless, it didn't excite me, especially due to the excessive volume fluctuations; however, it has its own original charm, almost medieval.
Perhaps this is better; I'll try to listen to it if I get the chance.
Beautiful cover with great tones and well-done graphics.
Regards, Gryphonic.

Wow, I wanted to write this review myself!
Anyway, it's fine, I'll come back later and read it calmly while lounging around.
Busy regards.

Information regarding the comment on the review of the good telespalla.
1) It is often said or written "donkey" to those who make mistakes or err, and this can also be read in encyclopedias. Nothing could be more wrong because the donkey is not stupid; on the contrary... For example, if you want to have a horse carry many weights or materials, the horse will do it even at the risk of its own death, while the donkey will not, so it is not stupid but intelligent. The donkey is indeed stubborn, but in certain situations, this may not be a flaw. Even the old story of the donkey's cap (a headpiece with two long ears) that was placed on the heads of negligent or ignorant students is a "nonsense" that endures to this day (it is still written in my encyclopedia). To return to music, even A. Belew, in the years with F. Zappa, was not able to read a score but knew how to play... If there are errors in the reviews, it doesn't seem that serious to me; I think everyone has made them to some extent. If they are serious, they can be pointed out "subtly," but the purpose of this "place," in my opinion, is not grammar but to introduce music, especially good music (depending on tastes). Of course, if the writing is well done, hats off, and it can also be pleasant to those who read it. Therefore, I do not feel ignorant regarding the review's assessment; I feel "ignorant" about all those topics that I do not know, in this case, music. Best donkey regards.

Ok! It seems fair to evaluate the commitment of the good mien, so I rate his review a 5.0 (without periodic) even though, for me, it was a 4.0 (without periodic). The fact of writing something that makes sense or not is relative. Who can really decide all this? (broadly applying Gödel's second theorem). The review may be enjoyed or not, but that's another story... I have never heard the album and I don't think it suits my neural-auditory system. Ah! Thank you, mien, for clarifying this particular in your reviews regarding the use of bold. Regards, Pop. PS: the cover is nice (it even rhymes).

Adder arrives to "comment" on this writing by the Escherian Zaireeka. Very original, of course it's not a review but it's always nice to read you. Who knows, maybe one day I'll also manage to take a trip to space (I would just need 80,000 euros). I love your new Escherian update (Relativity). I would add that curiously it fits perfectly with your writing "c'è ma non c'è" which has been published but hasn't been published. Everything is relative, and perhaps as Gödel says, even after the end of life, there will still be something left and the experiences and the "data" accumulated won't be truly lost. So close and yet so far... who knows, maybe one day in another time and place we'll meet... who knows. Now I must say goodbye also because I've once again gotten trapped in the art gallery in the Escher print gallery. Fortunately, in a storeroom (like last time) I found an old computer that allows me to write to you. Sooner or later I'll manage to get out (I'll use some tricks like last time). A periodic greeting (of course) from Adder.

@supersoul, received, @The Punisher... you're not willing to take a stand, huh?
Anyway, for me this is a five, also because here in the "director's chair," if I had given it a four, the "wise men" of the mountain would have "mauled" me, especially for the presence of the track "Patricia."
Then obviously tastes are tastes and that's how it should be. Otherwise, we would all be the same.
A "saucy" greeting to everyone and see you next time, I hope.