Dr.Adder

Ah!, I missed this 'typically Hetzerian' review, so the review is well done. Even though (in my opinion) it's too long as usual, but you already know that… More than reviews, yours seem like 'Camelati' treatises. The first lines seem excessive to me; some notable works came out during that period and even after, but I don't want to make the usual 'useless' lists with dozens of names of groups and musicians. Review rating: 4.15 (without a periodical). However, it’s not fair to write: have mercy, this is my first review... Album rating: 4.45 (periodical), a great album, even if it’s not perfect, but that doesn’t matter to me; I like it, and that’s enough. If you describe every track on an album 'minutely', it takes away some of the surprise; it almost seems like only you want to 'taste' the Camels audibly. Hey! There are others who listen to this group, including me... Echoes is undoubtedly a small masterpiece. I agree with what you wrote about You Make... and Down on..., while I do not agree about Rainbow's... it is absolutely not sappy! Simply stunning is the final guitar solo by CameLatimer (my personal way of calling Latimer trademarked ? & © hehe!) over the very fast percussive base of the unforgettable Ward. In fact, I’m going to listen to it again (periodically) after this. I completely agree with what you expressed in the last seven lines. Do you like my 'meaty' comment? PS: "another one". Dear Hetzer...

Good Paolo, your reviews are always recognizable, my score is 4.39 (without decimals), and the calculation was made with an old Aristo-Elektro slide rule. In my opinion, your review is not 'commonplace' and neither is it 'saturated with politeness'; here we go again with that term, maybe it's a bit too 'sugary'.
1) I quote Blackdog (trd.ita-canenero), because in another review he wrote more or less: enough with this hello guys/girls, we all know you're the_Paolo (but is it really you?).
2) The sausages (or "salciccie" in Romagnolo) are not fragrant; however, they are much healthier with cabbage than with fries. I hope that’s not your daily diet; at this point, given the scorching weather, I would recommend a fresh rice salad.
3) I'm starting to suspect that you might be...Z, but I can't be sure. If that's the case, you would be an 'unappreciated genius' in the Deb field (of course).
4) Now I have to go, I need to cross the mirror (the problem is not crossing it forward but backward! Or was it forward?).
Doubtful regards.

So... the review is well done, rating 4.77 (without decimal), although (in my opinion) slightly lengthy; however, it is professional and clarifying.
Almost always, double albums tend to 'wear out' the listener due to the excessive amount of 'material'; perhaps the only double album that comes to mind as not boring is... but it’s not really a double.
I know the JP; I’ve listened to BS.
"Here lie the mortal remains of the illustrious Michele Nostradamus, the only one, in the judgment of all mortals, worthy to write with almost divine hand, and under the influence of the stars, the future of the world."
Introduction to the book (I haven’t read it all yet; however, from what I’ve gathered, it must be very complex, over 480 pages) Le Profezie di Nostradamus De Vecchi Editore.
From what I’ve read, it also instills a great fear... destruction of cities like Paris and London, the disappearance of Rome due to a natural cataclysm, up to the inevitable final catastrophe when the known world will sink into Chaos... anyway, Nostradamus can be interpreted in various ways...
Hopeful regards.

A greeting and a (periodic) thank you to everyone.
@zaireeka (comment 35), it could also be, because the paths of music are infinite (or almost).
Unfortunately, Saturn is beautiful only to observe but to 'live there' or take a 'stroll' I don’t think so.
Sunny regards.

Maybe it's because Panico is one of the funniest reviewers of Deb.
Maybe it's because I also enjoy songs that last more than ten minutes (even eleven).
Maybe it's because sooner or later I’ll get a record by Karate.
Maybe it's because that (dentist) cover makes me want to brush my teeth right away.
Maybe it's because I don’t know whether to give you a 4 or a 5 (4.5?).
Maybe it's because now I have to run...

Greetings from Adder as well.
Best of luck (of course periodic) for real life.
Gray-velvety regards (if I may).

Good review, simple but effective, rating 4.4 (magazine).
A valid film, but in my opinion, it's not a masterpiece, also because if I remember correctly, there was another film... with the immense Al Pacino (much better than De Niro) slightly better, yet even that one wasn't a masterpiece.
Best regards.

The review is well done, especially because it’s nice and 'lively,' rating for the review 4.25 (periodical). There was a time when I often listened to Rondò Veneziano, the cover is also nice (it even rhymes). You almost made me want to listen to them again. Venetian greetings (of course).

Hey! Don’t think I forgot about your review. I’ll drop by unexpectedly when you least expect it, hihihi! Greetings, Gigerians.

Indeed, the colors are not exactly 'corresponding' to reality. Perhaps it’s your monitor, but I don’t think so. Sometimes the photos don’t turn out to be identical chromatically; one should use a kind of colorimeter as a point of reference on the painting before printing. Imagine that my photographer friend, when he once used his digital camera (which cost 5000 euros!), found that certain photos were even distorted and with completely different colors. Colorful regards.