Dr.Adder

Thank you all for the comments.
In this case, I'm giving a bëlo to Hell's comment.
Greetings, folk-eggianti.

As usual, your reviews are always well-curated and clarifying, I give it a rating of 4.6 (periodical).
Regarding the album, I'm currently listening to it and it seems really well done, maybe not a five, but a solid four is definitely fair (at least in my opinion).
My favorite tracks are the second, the fourth, and the last one, which is truly memorable; however, the others are also valid.
I (sigh!) do not own the LE version, I only have the 'normal' one purchased for about 10 Euros and something (when will they stop putting prices like 10.90-9.80-8.40 and so on?). Still, each time, I 'fire' all the small coins at it (and why not!).
The mere fact that there are valuable musicians in the lineup is already important; it's not always the case, but in this instance, it is.
Commendable is comment number 35 by shooting star; in fact, I give it a bëlo (if there's an extra option, why not use it).
I also agree that the album needs to be listened to in doses to be properly absorbed.
As for the DT… no comment; I definitely prefer this Transatlantic, I feel more heart and emotions.
Sure, at times they remind me a bit of past Prog bands, but what's the harm in that? Sometimes taking artistic inspiration is a sign of esteem (in this case, it seems to be), but not always, as sometimes it can also come from envy.
Of course, music continues on its path, even if more and more often it seems to 'retrace' patterns already explored by other groups or artists, and this will increasingly happen until... until the much-anticipated 'evolutionary leap' takes place, which may happen in the year 3400 and something (I don't remember exactly, but Nostradamus predicted it) with the end of Humanity, perhaps not understood as disappearance, but as the achievement of a new reality (but we won't be there anymore, unless someone finds a way to bring us back... sorry, these are the first harmful effects of the heat).
Finally, the cover (and thank goodness you're at least mentioning it) is good, but in the end, it's just the usual computerized cover. I prefer the more 'sweaty' ones done the old-fashioned way where you can see the artist's hand and sensitivity, but times are changing, unfortunately...
Okay!, after this transatlantic comment, I'm off to do some progressive meditation.
Progressive greetings, the green maNAlishi.

The wise one says: I apologize for the average, now I’ll give a nice five for this reviewer’s beautiful review.

Well! However, the rhymes were harder to write, instead of dots and smileys, at least for me.
Would a Q2 be needed?
I don't know, maybe someone else will think about it, maybe the Judge ;)

At least, it rhymes with good!
Let’s give a salute to Q, who may never return.
I at least hope to have entertained Someone, since life is already so sad.

I apologize, Your Honor, but the term ..... .. ...... is not to my liking, please correct it, do it for your honor.
Is the rhyme okay?

Ahhh! the average!.
The wise man says: what matters is the written, not the evaluated.
I apologize, in case someone wants to complain about the average, I have just set up a call center (toll-free number) 8991123, the number is active only on Wednesday night from 3 to 4.
A kind lady will answer, always available.

Boring? Alright, I'll delete it, are you happy now?
This way I'll leave more space for your less boring comments.
Sorrowful regards.

@melissa, I marked the collection because it's the only one I have, so I can't give you advice; maybe Jake knows more than I do.
@c'è, personally it engages me, maybe you're into a more 'bloodthirsty' guitar style.
Guitaristic greetings.

Yes! It’s me, because, why not?
But it could also not be... who knows.
The wise man says: don’t be certain of what has been written.
Cinematic greetings.