Alevox

MASTERPIECE???????? But you really can't take it anymore!!!

They will believe me, as long as they do not see cinematography as an art of mere form that has forgotten the pleasure of substance.

You have probably only been working in cinema for a few years (thankfully!), since you still love to fill your mouth talking about the best edits, long takes, and cinematography, thinking that others have no idea what you’re talking about. But you’re wrong; I know what a long take is without consulting vaccapedia. Now that you’ve decided to take this path, my dear Stanislavsky, come on, explain to me where "a better photography, a better edit, a better sound edit" are, because we ignorant folks are all curious to know... The truth is that you new national-populists defending low-quality cinema passed off as masterpieces are like Berlusconi, telling a load of nonsense, but the biggest problem is that you actually believe it!

The fact that you define "Dances with Wolves" as TACKY (just like Avatar!) simply shows that you don't understand anything about cinema—just look at the rating you gave this crappy little film.... A thousand times better are Robin Hood and Little John going through the forest, urka urka tirulero today the sun shines. Those were great entertainment films, not these sci-fi crap with a script written by a super-excited five-year-old in a mystical crisis of omnipotence. I didn’t mention it in the review because I didn’t feel like it, but the dialogues are straight out of the worst American action b-movies; it's not just the plot that sucks, but everything around it: the writing, the acting, the scene construction... just junk suitable for a late-night show on a private channel in South Tyrol (minus the 3D effects). And stop with this attitude of pathetic counter-revolutionaries; if a film is bad and they make millions of dollars off an outrageous amount of advertising, I think it’s only fair to throw a triple load of shit at it! Then, of course, if there’s a beautiful blockbuster, I’m the first one to give compliments, seriously, but this is simply crap sold as fragrant chocolate!

Very good review, unfortunately, I have to take away a point for some statements I don't quite agree with (This sequel is as good as "Moon Safari"!!! -psychedelic pinkfloydiana- "10,000 Hz Legend" was a masterpiece). I'm just starting to listen to the album, and I still refrain from giving a definitive judgment, but what I've heard so far at least makes me think that if there's one thing I'm sure of, it's that "Love 2" is far, and quite a bit, from "Moon Safari", although I absolutely do not deny the presence of very, very beautiful passages.

Well done! Great review, you went into quite a bit of detail, but it was worth reading because you're very likable, and you provide a comprehensive idea of the album. I'm still in the early stages of listening; it's true, there are some very flat moments, but there are others where they almost reach the heights of the ancient AIR, so it's not all for naught. However, I'm waiting to have clearer ideas before giving a definitive judgment.

Good Zoo.

noooooooooooooo I messed up giving the ratings to the albumooooooo!

Great. A complete and excellently written review. High level. You said it all about the album.

But is this a new group? Never heard of it...