Rooftrampler92

DeRank ™: 1,67

DeAge™ : 6765 days • Here since 2 december 2007

Afterhours I milanesi ammazzano il sabato

11 may 08

Voto:

Too much penny criticism for those who critique After... it's been seven or eight years now that we keep hearing "Agnelli is washed up" or "Iriondo is gone, uh uh uh uh". Enough, it's pointless to trash a work like this with such criticisms; the album is good, I listened to it for the first time yesterday and it's not bad, it may be short but it's varied. I certainly prefer Germi or Hai paura del Buio, but time passes for everyone and Agnelli has changed since the late '90s. But where is this work embarrassing? Enough of always saying the same nonsense without explaining it with some reasoning. The review, as far as I'm concerned, expresses the content of the album quite well.

Vibracathedral Orchestra Tuning to the Rooster

9 may 08

Voto:

"I have a metaphysical draft so, people"...beautiful.

The 13th Floor Elevators Easter Everywhere

9 may 08

Voto:

Here comes someone returning... of the 13th floor I prefer the first one but this one is no less. Pioneers, yes, but it was the posthumous ones who hallucinated San Francisco and then all of America. Well done Melissa, a few lines and a nice review.

Grand Funk Railroad On Time

9 may 08

Voto:

Interesting proposal, but theirs is the good, healthy, and genuine rock that's slightly hard, and by now their music is well done and packaged. The good old days of rock.

Brian Eno Before And After Science

9 may 08

Voto:

It took me a century to read through this whole jumble; the fact is there's everything and more. Our Black is still better. I have some loose Eno tracks, no albums, and I know this one by reputation but have never listened to it. Eno (and his friends) remains a genius of contemporary music.

Killer Kane Band Mr. Cool

8 may 08

Voto:

One of your best. Very realistic and expressive. It oozes life and years spent listening to music. In your last review, I mentioned that I wouldn't praise you anymore because there are plenty of other people who do, and it would be entirely pointless, but this review is more than just a review.

Afterhours I milanesi ammazzano il sabato

8 may 08

Voto:

Chinaski, I'm sorry, but Larrok is absolutely right. The review is not meant to explain an album that everyone has already heard, but rather to convince the reader to buy the album. Therefore, a person can definitely judge a review without having listened to the album. The review is good if it convinces in a few lines, due to its originality, justified context, and clear exposition. The judgment given by the reviewer in question is respectable, but only if there’s a well-argued and well-placed reason behind it. These few lines, filled with vague comments, are frustrating to me. So I say the review sucks because it doesn’t justify what it says; therefore, I rate the review without having rated the album. Clear?