MIDISUN

DeRank : 0,10
DeAge™ : 6926 days • Here since 23 june 2007
Johannes Brahms Ein deutsches Requiem
Voto:
but yes yes.. I agree.. it's just the term feels a bit out of place given the solemnity of the topic.. that they drank and фромбассеров like and perhaps more than us is beyond doubt ;)
Johannes Brahms Ein deutsches Requiem
Voto:
Good review, even if a bit fragmented. Too bad about that "seghe mentali" that clashes (it's a requiem by Brahms that you're reviewing).
Marianne Faithfull Broken English
Voto:
But wasn't it a kinder?
Enrico Mentana Matrix 25/9/2008
Voto:
Oh come on, dear G. We're not doing well! Destroimbonitori? But what about those on the left, what are they? Maybe starting with Alemanno? For heaven's sake, my friend G, look... create another site for this kind of pornocommunist nonsense - you yes! - charlatan! "Make good use of it"?? Like you do? Just stop before you even start! You’re scraping the bottom of the barrel!
Coldplay Viva La Vida Or Death And All His Friends
Voto:
SNAP with welcome to tomorrow better than Coldplay with viva la vida!
Eric Clapton From the Cradle
Voto:
Mm.. you say?.. no come on.. I really didn't want to.. ;)) P.S.: seriously thinking about it, damn how much I miss playing.
Coldplay Viva La Vida Or Death And All His Friends
Voto:
The single they're sending out these days sounds a lot like a very old disposable song sung in the video by some girls on spaceships (!!!) (around 1992) titled "welcome to tomorrow." It's on YouTube.
Eric Clapton From the Cradle
Voto:
So... the rating is 3, but I'm giving you 4 because you're a rare little blusettara ;) The album is, in my opinion - in its genre! - a 4, but... but... it’s one of the few albums that guided me in learning slide guitar, and even now, after 15 years, when I put it back on, I ENJOY IT! ;) So, 5. Eric is always clean and precise; maybe for those looking for who knows what kind of fantasies, that’s a limitation, but in my opinion, it’s a great quality. Of course, in the long run, he can get boring. But not on this album. Ah Terry... I'm getting in line to marry you, okay? :))
Radiohead Ok Computer
Voto:
Oh, okay, Biorc is a genius... So ultimately I can assert that the principle of conservation, when considered comprehensively, involves matter-energy regarded no longer as two separate realities but as a unified whole, given that one can transform into the other according to a very precise mathematical relationship. What remains constant on our little planet and in the Universe is the sum of mass and energy.
The formula expresses in any reference system the total energy of a particle at rest.
If the body is in motion, the correct (and complete) formula is:
with . For a body that starts from rest, we have v = 0 and ? = 1, and we find the particular case .
Here, mass is understood as the relativistic mass of the body, to be distinguished from the inertial mass m. The inertial mass can be considered a property of the body, since in inertial motion it remains unchanged. In inertial motion, with no variations in gravitation, velocity, direction, and the orientation of motion do not change. Conversely, a change in gravitation implies a change in the velocity vector: if the velocity of the body changes, it is its mass that modifies the external field; conversely, a significant variation in the surrounding gravitation can clearly alter the trajectory and the intensity of motion.
The concept of relativistic mass can be understood by imagining that a mass of 1 kg, falling to the ground at a speed of 100 km/h, causes the same damage as a mass of 100 kg falling from a height of just a few centimeters. The extent of the damage depends on momentum, taking into account both mass and speed factors. The concept of relativistic mass extends the concept of gravitational mass, just as Einstein's theory generalizes Newton's gravity.
With these considerations, it makes sense to define a mass that depends on speed (which would be the product of the rest mass, inertial mass, and the term ?):
m = m(v), and in particular that:
, and that:
.
In other words, relativistic mass is not an independent property of speed v, but increases with it. As speed approaches that of light, the mass of the body tends towards infinity.
To accelerate a body with a mass greater than zero from rest to the speed of light, infinite energy would be required. This would be necessary not only to exceed the speed of light but to reach it minus any small amount you desire, an infinitesimal.
A second reason why the speed of light cannot be exceeded comes from the equations that explain the contraction/dilation of space-time in special relativity.
Radiohead Ok Computer
Voto:
If Biorc is a genius, then I am Einstein.