OleEinar

Excellent.

Funny, you made me smile, which isn't easy these days. So I give you 5.

Look, Battle, I have nothing against metalheads; you might even be likable to me, even though I fundamentally agree with what surfer told you (I mean, I don't like the idea of "classifying": you're a metalhead, that one is emo, that one is punk; it's a somewhat childish perspective, but you'll realize it over time). Also, it's not that your review made me angry; I simply didn't like it, and I told you why, that's all. What bothered me was the way you reacted to the criticism, labeling people as musically incompetent. This isn't about a lack of respect toward you or ostracism because you're only 16; it simply stems from the fact that at your age, for obvious mathematical reasons, you can't have the knowledge that a 50-year-old who has always lived for music possesses. Then you reply to me, "it's clear that among almost peers we understand each other immediately, older people are stubborn and go on with blinders on!!" and you only confirm what I told you before. It's fine to think for yourself, but please spare us the image of the misunderstood 16-year-old in conflict with adults. (Ah, I'm 24 years old.)

<< Oh really, music understands more than I do?? Do you know how many music genres I know?? I guess you don’t, because comparing me to those two jerks makes me laugh a bit!! >> I mean, you’re 16 years old and you come here calling anyone who dares to criticize you a jerk and incompetent? You’re 16 years old and you come here boasting about having more extensive musical knowledge than someone who’s 40 or 50? You’re 16 years old and you come here flaunting your great expertise and your knowledge of a thousand genres? You have an unbearable as well as ridiculous attitude, lower your pride kid and try to be a little more humble, who do you think you are?

It doesn't attract me either, but the review does :-)

Great debut beenees, interesting proposal.

Very good.

I'm sorry, but I have to align myself with the criticisms of super and surfer. An unnecessarily lengthy review, a track-by-track analysis that's boring (what's the point of that?), and filled with colloquial and illegible expressions. You could have saved us the first 15 lines. Unfortunately, the editors' call to avoid rambling essays of a million lines was ignored, but that was already known. Then, when you decide to share your writing, you also have to be willing to accept any criticism; it doesn't make sense to respond, "you don't even deserve an answer because I've understood that you have no inclination for music," to someone who's 30 years older than you and, if I may say so, probably knows a lot more about music than you do. Like, a lot, a lot.

@super, they don't open because the author has withdrawn them, like those of the Cressida.

Alright, he was right, but I think he's also had enough of looking in his own house before talking about others, you know?