vitols4

Lidjs: I agree with Enbar, and know that you will hardly find better in that discography. Venus & Mars, in my opinion, is quite valid and interesting, while I personally love the sound and atmosphere of "London Town."

Why do they take them off after a while? It's not on the list...

I'm a bit embarrassed to say it, but in a couple of his songs after the crap of his early days, I noticed, between the lines, something vaguely listenable. a 1.5 that becomes 1 by default.

POLIROCK, do you really think I haven't? I've blown out 3 speakers listening to RAM, and yet I recognize some of its limits. ENBAR: it seems we have similar tastes... especially when it comes to Yoko. LONDON: soon another review that I was expecting from you... I happily filled in the gap. You'll see that it will bring you more satisfaction... ;)

I believe you would write well and earn a heart even if you were talking about Meneguzzi (give it a try!). But I understand what’s being discussed—genres, styles, backgrounds—just from the comments of others... so I’ll wait for the review, then. As I often do, I take off my hat and praise the beautiful piece of literature. WELL DONE!

What a disappointment... you totally fell for it... at this point, I thought you were at least a bit more cunning. come on, you're a caricature!

Come on, it can only be a joke anyway... ha ha ha. I fell for it...

My Jesus... what meagerness and carelessness... is there a filter from the editors of the coolest site on the internet? Come on, 19 lengths, but did you mess up the dates and premature deaths on purpose? Be honest... anyway, it's not funny.
Aside from that, I played the drums in metal bands for about 15 years (assuming that gives me the right to make outrageous judgments), and I'm still astonished by the inventiveness of the rhythm section in "Come Together" and "Something." The bass in both these pieces has been a reference point and inspiration for generations of bassists (I played bass in a Beatles cover band that toured half of Europe...) that said, I think arguing with you is a waste of breath. Setting aside everyone’s tastes, my only sincere advice is this: grow up a bit, and with a bit of self-respect, avoid making these ridiculous blunders.

I don't think so, but I respect your opinion.

Egegerrimo LONDON, I consider the mistake of the instrumentalists serious (forgive me), while the one regarding Linda's credits is far from grave. I tried to put myself in the ears of someone listening to the album who doesn’t know who Linda was, who doesn’t know that she was a good emotional support, that she was what Paolino had always been looking for, that she was a good photographer or whatever. Those who listen hear a voice that is truly not up to par. As for the fact that she had a say in the compositional stage, I have some reservations, but even if she were Battisti, he definitely wouldn't have had Mogol sing the backing vocals. I ADORE Paul and miss Linda, but I try to be objective and when some things disturb my ears, I say it, trying to forget "the spirit that is within," which is of little concern to the average listener. The album was devastated by the critics of the time, and even Ringo spoke poorly of it!!! It has been re-evaluated over the years and it deserves credit for its eclecticism and "sound," but in my humble opinion, it contains a fair amount of material of average quality. In short, dear London, to each their own opinions, even in the magical world of the fab4. Until next time!