azzo

Hi Psicho, I was waiting for you; it comforts me that you didn't like it either. Regarding Sorge: I still like how he writes because he always manages to explain the coordinates of a new group, so he knows what one can expect. For instance, the Vanilla Fudge came to my mind while listening to the album. I'm going to read Sorge's review, and he thought of them too. I should have read his review first. The fact that he's been missing the mark lately, I think, is because he has to find some good albums to talk about; otherwise, he needs to change his profession. Deep down, I think he doesn't even believe it himself.

I stopped at page one when I read that the protagonist was named Frank Ottobre, if I remember correctly. Speaking of page 1, Rev: "The sky had the same color as a television tuned to a dead channel." P.S.: is this about the ZOT rensinone?

@Bartle, I read Sorge too, and I thought of you... is it broken? (let's not mention that Ondarock has a pretty negative take on it:-))

Good evening, thank you for coming by as usual. I feared I had been too harsh and that I was just getting old, but I see that everyone who listened to the album didn't quite appreciate it... and yet people are talking about it very positively, because, I don't know. @Gabri: too many affinities, I too love the keyboards... I knew it, and I wanted to give them a chance, vade retro!

@Hi Ole, if you could spare a few comments in the other reviews, you could do some reviews;-) Otherwise, before long, you’ll be doubling some historic columns! @Gay q.q: instead of tossing coins, you could follow the advice of ...caz...:-) @Coccagnocca: I have the same idea, maybe we’ll talk in private a few days before the concert. @Psycho, hi, a little voice was telling me you’d stop by: better the old Black M. and the Pink than the latest Black M., right?

Good evening, thank you for stopping by. I am a bit perplexed by the lack of votes on the reviews. I've noticed this trend in other reviews lately, but I avoided comments. Frankly, I don't understand the reason for it, but there it is. I want to emphasize that, in my humble opinion, any dissent or agreement, if justified, is always welcome. Specifically: @Sfascia: it seems to me that you at least know Black Sabbath and the Velvet Underground; that's already something. As for the others, put in some effort, you'll find them in the best stores in the boot (islands included). Not in the giant bags of PAI chips. @Lemuro, I can't help but agree with you; I’m also a fan of Montenegro (the bitter, I mean). @Franci: the comparisons with Messer Sfa weren't heavy enough, and the sheets of metal weren't even scratched. @Bubi, hi, you're authorized to come down and burn my house; I’m always in debt to you, I don’t remember it unless you stop by on my reviews. I hope it rains this weekend, so if I remember, I'll take a look. @n Gay whatever: honored that your first comment is for me, may you have a long life on DeB.

Dear Mustacchio, I'm responding on my own behalf. The problem is very simple. I took the liberty of giving a 1 to a review of Taxirider because it claimed that the third velvet was an acoustic record. Now, anyone can write whatever the hell they want, but if someone lacks the humility to review a classic while writing such nonsense, can I point it out, or what's the point of ratings? In response, the young man, instead of saying "Oops, I made a mistake," which happens to everyone, came to randomly give me I don't know how many low ratings on my reviews. So, I commented on a couple of other reviews, without even rating him, but just pointing out that he was stating incorrect things. Like here: Iside said it first: the review was already there and was better done. Now, one can make all the duplicates in the world, but it is presumed they have something particularly intelligent to say, not that Still is a collection of singles when there isn't even one single. Can I point that out without him coming again to give a random low rating to my reviews? Or is it forbidden here to criticize, and responses to criticism come from childish revenge like six-year-olds? Go ask the staff to remove the ratings on reviews. As long as I'm here, I will continue to give a 1 to anyone who claims that the third velvet is an acoustic record. Which is as much as saying that Chianti is a white wine. For heaven's sake.

Mmmh, from the video it seems like it's making a big mess, which is already a good sign, even though I don't think I could handle it for the entire album. And then, at the end of a plethora of fast fashion, this review fits just right.

Thank you Supervai, very kind of you. Proud that you liked the page.

But do you realize what a piece of shit you are? As usual, when faced with criticism, you respond by giving me a one-star rating. Do you realize that everyone here considers you an idiot? Do you understand that going around giving one stars to my reviews, where there are no ones except for those from Balckdog, only proves that you are the biggest idiot among all the debaseriani? Haven't you figured out yet that since your reviews are appreciated as much as steaming shit, your ones in my reviews are worth nothing, because you have a shit ranking? IT'S WASTED TIME YOU FUCKING FASCIST.