trickykid

But ultimately, the hedonism of the '80s could only produce the manic-depressive situation of a good part of the '90s. That's why I sought refuge in the '60s-'70s. Always for the JUDGE and those who want there to be 1 review for 1 record: more opinions, more comparisons. The drama isn't the number of reviews, but the frequent lack of quality in many of them. If they are really useless, I don't understand why read them and maybe leave your comment.

SENMAYAN, you are completely right. It was tough being a kid in the '90s; the music only talked about depression, incest, violence, lost or dead fathers, the inability to relate normally to oneself and others, toxic romantic relationships, and so on. It's a trend that is found scattered throughout all the significant '90s music (from TRICKY to PJ HARVEY, to various GRUNGE bands, NICK CAVE, and so forth).

Dear Judge, if the comments are pouring in, even if this is the 10,000th review, it means it has a certain, obscure and incomprehensible, utility. In particular, this review deserves credit for reflecting on the phenomenon, on a group, on an album that, no matter how well-known they are. Perhaps my comment about working in a bank was unfortunate, but more so are those who assume the role of great alternates only to suddenly disregard it, caught up in the anxiety of settling down. Ultimately, I just wanted to say that I've seen this record in the hands of many fake-alternatives, the annoying type, the ones you find (and you don’t know why, or maybe you do but it’s unspeakable to say, as the Italian reality is indecent) happily "settled" (without any experience in casual jobs, precarious work or unemployment, rest assured). I finally censor your equation of unemployment and precarious work, as they are, sociologically, legally, and economically, different phenomena. I also note a certain populism on your part, but I shall overlook it. As is well known, populism is quite trendy these days.

This page is very well written. Who cares if it's the millionth time this album is being reviewed?! *** to the REVIEWER. I haven't listened to the album since school, although it has historical value and is also a classic from the '90s. It reminds me of those idiots who wanted to make a revolution back in the day and now work in a bank.

+ more than a critical comment, the review is a THESIS. Amazing album. The first time I saw ANTONY live, he was accompanying LOU REED as a backing vocalist. Then the album and the tour of ANTONY&THE JOHNSONS in a club here in the extreme SOUTH OF ITALY. And that was money well spent.

This is DRAKE's most refined album in terms of arrangement and production. The first and PINK MOON, very different from each other, didn't have the overt intent to BREAK THROUGH. Instead, this album was conceived by DRAKE as his consecration to the public, something that did not happen, exacerbating his inner turmoil.

GREAT LITTLE RICHARD! The epic rock story tells of his jealousy for the young HENDRIX, who was at the time a member of his band. The review is perfect and has an intro that even PADOA-SCHIOPPA would approve. The BAMBOCCIONI born, raised, and nurtured on tribal r&r sounds.

GREAT MASTERPIECE *****. (But it’s not a folk record).

I almost forgot the grades...

The review is well written (aside from the grammatical errors): it expresses well the emotions of the evening, the situations that occurred, and the artist. As for JARRETT's music, there are no words. My vote goes to his extraordinary career and his indispensable albums.
@CONTEMPLAZIONE It seems to me that you are missing CONCERTS and OSAKA in your list while I agree with the exclusion of MY SONG (an album never understood, albeit famous and celebrated).