ilfreddo

DeRank : 6,94
DeAge™ : 6976 days • Here since 5 may 2007
Forsaken After The Fall
Voto:
Looking at the cover, I felt like I could hear the record.
Howard Phillips Lovecraft L'ombra su Innsmouth
Voto:
Yes. Some combinations are truly sacrilegious. And genius.
Lou Reed New York
Voto:
Congratulations! You've managed to come across as more obtuse than a Manowar fan, just to stay on theme.
Stefano Incerti Gorbaciof
Voto:
The film disappointed me. Exceptional performance by Servillo, whom I adore since "La ragazza del lago," but this film seems to be built a bit too much around his character. Those 10-15 minutes of silence seem quite forced to emphasize his expressiveness. In short, 5 and still 5 for the lead, the story overall and its development too, along with that ending… hmm. Finally, applause to you for skillfully reviewing an Italian film that is still worth watching.
Lale Andersen Lili Marleen
Voto:
You are the best "new acquisition" of the site. Great job cum punto escalmatif!
Ascanio Celestini La pecora nera
Voto:
Continuing to talk about Italian actors: I just came back from "GorbacioF". Servillo is truly a phenomenal actor! The film itself didn’t excite me much, but his performance is worth every bit of the 5 euros!
Ascanio Celestini La pecora nera
Voto:
No Fusillo, I didn't confuse Stuart with Accorsi. The latter I really don't like. I just completely messed up! I was referring to "Le Chiavi di casa," but for some reason "La Stanza del Figlio" came up instead. I apologize.
Dante Alighieri Comedìa (Divina Commedia)
Voto:
My point of view is different and revolves around the varying standards applied to similar reviews (academic and those that echo what others have written) on the site (see. opera d'arte), given that this one does not seem any more scandalous than others, but rather average. That said, I also don't quite understand the sense of trying to review everything, almost as if it were an obligation to expand the database endlessly. Rereading the previous comment, I did indeed make a mistake by stating that an academic review is the only way to attempt to review masterpieces. Let's say that in my opinion, this approach (rewriting what has been read/studied elsewhere) is the easiest, most immediate, and natural one, while to be able to stray from this type of critique and make connections with other minor works, one must be truly very knowledgeable. I don't even feel capable of rating the work since I only have a faded, ancient memory that I would need to dust off.
Dante Alighieri Comedìa (Divina Commedia)
Voto:
Many comments are cowardly, gratuitous, and snobbish. From what pulpit, then. From the people of debaser who give the Mona Lisa a solid 4.41 and a fair 4.23 of encouragement for Michelangelo's David???? I greatly admire Deep Frank and Cornell, but why do their school-like reviews (because that’s the only way to approach absolute masterpieces like these) get a 4, while there’s all this fervor for something that, even if it doesn’t say anything new, is far from being a string of blasphemies? I really don’t see why the hell Mozart's Requiem is totally acceptable without any problem, but the Divine Comedy is not! Damn, this is sacrilegious: better a review on Dream or Maiden!!! I believe there are other terrible reviews on debaser that deserve a 1, at least for the courage.
Dante Alighieri Comedìa (Divina Commedia)
Voto:
I haven't seen this yet, but I've heard great things about it.