ArnoldLayne

But do you really pay attention to this very human type?? Ahhha what a character you are, weren't you the one who didn’t take me into account? What’s up, now you consider me? Good, keep talking nonsense, that's all you're good at..

Ahhahahah don't make us laugh even more than you already have!! Do you really think I would have all those fakes?????? Clown...

Ahhahahah don't make us laugh even more than you already have!! Do you really think I would have all those fakes?????? Clown...

At least it’s clear that there are beautiful parts and some less beautiful ones, what do you want?

What to say? To someone with a nickname like that, to a proposal like that??

Vic, are you rich? Good for you..

FIRST POINT: But what did I generalize? I simply said "maybe you can't even imagine," because I don't know who you are or what you have listened to, and it's completely reasonable and human for me to have doubts. Could I ever claim that you, outside of those few groups I mentioned, know nothing? Is that what you understood? Well, no, I just said that "maybe" you don't know certain things outside of that context, and the expression "maybe you can't even imagine," which I think you know very well, is precisely an expression, a way of saying, for some it's even a filler. Don't focus on these literary trifles. What I contested was your statement, "Now, don't tell me you started with ARNOLDLAYNE...someone who gives 1 to TELEVISION| What am I saying? someone who gives 1 to everything that isn't prog.!!!" This is, however, a huge generalization, which you are using not only against me but even against OleEinar who, in this discussion, might not care at all about what I think of Television or Radiohead, given that he quoted other words of mine related to this context. SECOND POINT: As long as you say it's nonsense to judge Television or Radiohead poorly (obviously trying to deviate from the context we were discussing), then I can only respond that it’s not nonsense, for 3 reasons: 1) I've already explained in the respective reviews why, in my opinion, it's legitimate to have given those judgments, and not nonsense. 2) Because here it doesn’t matter a damn and I’m not interested in indulging your personal grievances about issues outside the 2 discussions we were having, namely your unfounded attack on OleEinar and before that, the matter of prog's flaws. 3) Because if you simply limit yourself to saying "it's nonsense," I am completely satisfied to tell you that "no, it’s not nonsense." THIRD POINT: When I said "You are the one building castles in the air, wanting to create these prog vs. the rest of music rivalries," I wasn't referring to your idea about prog vs. the rest of music; I never said you were against prog in absolute terms, but I was referring to what you think of me, namely the rivalries you think I want to create, and I replied by saying that you are mistaken since I like many other things outside of prog. That these things are not the same ones you like (like Television or Radiohead) is not something I can change, but I don’t think there is any need or reason to discuss it here.

Good album, pleasant, but it's hard not to appear (I say appear because being it is obvious) derivative in a genre like prog metal.

I'm getting worked up because you excel at anti-reasoning. Because you attack Ole in an absolutely unfair manner, straying off topic without even realizing it. Because in the discussions on this page, the Television have absolutely nothing to do with it. Because despite me telling you that my favorite artists are not prog and that I love many bands outside of prog, you stubbornly continue to say that I rate the bands you like a 1 just because they're not prog, when if you were to reread my comments on the reviews you're referencing, you would notice my explanation about the low scores given to those bands, and you call me ignorant simply because you like those bands and I don't. You're the one building castles in the air, trying to create this rivalry between prog and the rest of music. Know that in the rest of music, there are not just Television, Residents, Nirvana, Radiohead, Pearl Jam, or Morphine (the bands for which I received the most backlash for giving low scores), but there are countless other things that perhaps you can't even imagine, but GENERALIZING is an unfair card often played by provocateurs like you.

Yes, I don't deny that "seeing them" would have been a nice experience, but "listening to them" certainly wouldn't have been, you understand what I mean? A while ago, I went to see Santana at the Circo Massimo, it was a beautiful visual concert, but I couldn't care less about his corazon espinado :DD