ArnoldLayne

Heavy receipt more than the film

Hooray Alan, but I need to listen to him better.

And now, how do you feel, Zanna? Any sudden erections?

puni but who is in the photo??

Huh? But what could you have meant?

Although it is a record of electronic music, it is truly a masterpiece.

Well, you see that I prefer this record a hundred times over the one you intend to review!!

and the 13th floor elevators right after

But the argument is quite the opposite. The Beatles were influential, but to be honest, I could have done without almost all the bands that were influenced by them. The same goes for the Velvet Underground. The influence a band has on someone is not necessarily synonymous with value; it’s not a point in their favor, because an indirect quality of the band comes into play. To put it plainly, the goal of Led Zeppelin was neither to be influential to anyone nor, even less so, to invent something that would serve as a reference point for later bands. They are a great band for other reasons. Were Black Sabbath more influential? Undoubtedly, but that means nothing. You have in front of you the proposal of Led Zeppelin and the proposal of Black Sabbath. Nothing more. And undoubtedly, the more interesting one is the first. Now, with the premise that "influence" is not synonymous with "quality," let’s delve into this discussion about "influences." First of all, we need to determine whether we should consider the quantity or the quality of these groups that have been influenced. When you say "x is more influential than y," what does that mean? Did it influence more groups or did it influence better groups? If we don’t establish this, it’s hard to proceed in this kind of discussion. My personal opinion is that if we are talking about influential groups, then the Yardbirds are at the top in both quantity and quality of the influenced groups. Thank you for your attention.

peggiocox you can be sure that this record is better than the crap you listen to