GonzoBiputre

do you know where you can stick that black monolith? and then enough playing on memories... how many easy sentimentalities. come on, be good.

èncùlet

I really appreciate these gems.

decayed

THE IDIOT MAY HAVE LITTLE RELEVANCE, BUT MORE THAN 3000 CONTACTS....70 COMMENTS.....I GUESS THE IDIOTS HERE ARE OTHERS.... TO THINK THAT MILES DAVIS, IN THE REVIEWS ABOUT HIM, NEVER GOES ABOVE 500...

I'm asking you. Subjective judgment (if it's objective let me know) on Basquiat and Warhol. Then, if you want, I’ll tell you what the critics say, and if you think the detractors are equally right, then I say: they’ve lost. The two are mythologized, museumfied, overvalued, honored, analyzed, and biographed for years and years. That they are also a commercial phenomenon is fine by me, but that’s the beauty of pop art. Warhol played with advertising/the commercial phenomenon. I await replies (p.s: gonzo is uxo and uxo is gonzo) bye.

You have to excuse me, NOT OVERrated, BUT UNDERrated. Sorry.

Reliability. It is the key to objective judgment, which is structured, as I said, also on predetermined criteria or schools of thought. I did not say that the reliability of one invalidates the other. The issue of synonyms does not matter since we are not dealing with a lexical problem here, but rather trying to distinguish the nature of the opinion. I know Lucian Freud and I can agree with you, he is probably a bit overrated. For example, this statement comes directly from an art critic, Franco Boni, who has had his head buried in paintings since he was 12 years old and has also written several books. I can respect his opinion, which, in light of my aesthetic perception, transforms into objective judgment. I do not understand, now that I reread it, what your post is for: does it close? does it open? does it correct? does it provoke? does it ask? does it affirm? does it feel indignant?

I seek, certainly I seek

the asses I pray