gnoato

Avril Lavigne: such an abomination.

Pretty beautiful, with a deep meaning. It's been a while since I last watched it, great review. One of Moroder's best soundtracks.

I wonder if there are still bastards in the world who give 1 to an album like this. And to the review, too...

The "New Jack Swing" wasn't named by Michael Jackson but by a journalist from the New York Times in 1986 (by 1991, "New Jack Swing" was almost at the end of its days). As for the review, I note with utmost displeasure that many parts have been nicely copy-pasted from the review of "Dangerous" found in the book by the Irishman Ken Paisli "Michael Jackson dossier: la vita, gli scandali, il processo". No no no, that's not acceptable at all. And what you added isn't exactly impressive either. I give you a piece of advice: since you’re “magical,” I would suggest you work your magic and learn to write something truly YOURS. You can't fool me, especially when Jacko is involved (and this goes for the reviews of "HIstory" and "Bad" that you, without much hesitation, copied verbatim from the book and pasted onto DeBaser just to look cool, like the Tokio Hotel that you secretly admire).

Um, I'm really sorry "magical," but your review is identical to the one in the book by the Irishman Ken Paisli "Michael Jackson dossier: la vita, gli scandali, il processo." You really couldn't come up with one on your own, could you? The album is really not that great anyway. As for you, the "magical" reviewer, I'd suggest you perform a nice magic trick and learn to write something that's truly YOURS. You can't pull a fast one on me, especially when it involves Jacko.

Um, sorry "magical", but your review is identical to the one in the book by Irish author Ken Paisli "Michael Jackson dossier: la vita, gli scandali, il processo". You could hardly manage to make it your own, could you? The album is nice, but Thriller remains unbeatable. As for you, the reviewer, being "magical", I would suggest you perform some real magic and learn to write something that's truly YOURS. You can't fool me, especially when it comes to Jacko.

Excellent album, from start to finish, it always puts me in a good mood. But was it really necessary to review it once again?

But "Nevermind" HAS marked an era. The era of nonsense!

But "Nevermind" HAS marked an era. The era of nonsense!

SANJURO, music is NOT noise; it is a precise order of sounds, and I believe even a deaf-mute would notice the difference between a jackhammer and a Mozart symphony. If you refer to the experiments of John Locke and Dodecaphony (prepared piano and similar things), do you still think that if there is no precise and set order of notes (even if perhaps in tune), the genre cannot be defined as "musical"? And then, regarding singing: you might get bored (why?) but when I listen to someone sing, I EXPECT them to know how to do it! What’s the point for a person to sing if they can’t do it? It’s unacceptable for you to sing a B instead of a C. I can accept it if it’s a live performance (mistakes, as we know, can happen to anyone) but I won't tolerate it if it’s a studio recording. But if only singing were the problem with "Nevermind"... alas, no! The whole album is nonsense, a joke, a useless generational manifesto, twenty years out of date (but there’s worse: some still believe they live in the sixties). The only revolution it induced was a pointless rebellion and suicide (both are stupid and useless) of many listeners, the vast majority of whom are teenagers. The story of the band should be exemplary. And then: what a disgusting cover! If you don’t have a sense of shame, for heaven's sake, at least pretend (so you can sell a little more) and put a decent cover on your crappy album, at least then something can be saved. NO! Because we are rebels and we must ruin everything, whether it goes bad or whether it goes well! But for goodness’ sake... what a horror... what obscenity... what... what... ... ... ...what A PIECE OF SHIT ALBUM!!!!!