alessioIRIDE

DeRank : 3,14
DeAge™ : 7070 days • Here since 31 january 2007
Wim Wenders Der Himmel über Berlin (Il Cielo Sopra Berlino)
Voto:
dear, not to mention beautiful, sfascia :), I sent the review correctly... but guaranteed with lemon, and I have sent emails to the editors' email in the past, yes, three, not even one, when you weren't publishing my reviews, and since I was never even given the courtesy of a reply (which, by the way, your review doesn't suck jaguars), now I only write open emails to the public, which is still a little fancy... very post-World War II intellectual. rather, it would be nice to know who, whether a real or virtual person, edited this review... or not? thanks anyway for adding the final little piece. haloa... or rather, tschuss :)
Wim Wenders Der Himmel über Berlin (Il Cielo Sopra Berlino)
Voto:
I don't know who merenghetti is, but he's definitely slow, but it has to be like that. It's based on thoughts, it lets you enter the story slowly... of course, you have to be in tune and well-disposed, but I can't say. For me, it's wonderful, but I understand it might bore some; I have never been bored watching it, and I think I've seen it about 6-7 times. Then, well...
Wim Wenders Der Himmel über Berlin (Il Cielo Sopra Berlino)
Voto:
it ended like this: << A stream of thoughts flowing slowly, allowing you to gradually step into the film, on tiptoes. The Sky Over Berlin is the most beautiful hymn to life I have ever experienced. >> of course, small details, but not a coincidence.
Wim Wenders Der Himmel über Berlin (Il Cielo Sopra Berlino)
Voto:
how nice how clever the editors of debaser are... they deleted a part of my review. how clever, they complain that people edit poorly and then they amputate reviews. how nice how clever.
Heatmiser Mic City Sons
Voto:
Well done, we really needed a review of Heatmiser... mine was starting to suffer from loneliness. I fully agree with your review; surely nothing transcendent about Heatmiser... but they need to be spread. This one is softer, the others are more "fugazzosi" and I prefer them. Anyway, long live Elliott Smith, who can still move me like a teenager... perhaps the last great songwriter or at least the greatest of his generation.
Soft Machine Third
Voto:
I listen to any Rino Gaetano album at least once a day, I feel at least eighty years old and I'm as blind as a fifteen-year-old. Who feels sorry for me? At the "scaruffino": oh, you forgot to put the water in the card.
Ten Years After Rock & Roll Music to the World
Voto:
I come back from my self-imposed exile just to say that Celinè is a Nazi, just for some idiot suffering from cognitive dysfunctions who can call himself AryanBrotherhod (with just one "o") and put into the ballot a drawing that glorifies the SS (but where are the editors? Isn’t this a crime in this shit country? XII transitional provision of the constitution, fucking patafisicians) hoping to make us believe it’s just an aesthetic thing. Listen up, read Mea Culpa where Cèline explains a couple of things to you, puts a few dots on the i’s for those idiots who can’t read between the lines... actually, do this: stick to talking about music and not about things you can’t understand. As Cèline would say: ā€œDon’t speculate on great matters. For a jerk, that’s the maximum!ā€
Jawbox Grippe
Jawbox Grippe
21 aug 08
Voto:
I wrote the "review" myself, and if I've mentioned Novelty 10, 100, or 1000 times, it's because no one knows that album. People listen to crappy bands like the Smashing Pumpkins, come to Debaser to be critics using Scaruffi's words, and then nobody knows Novelty... so why didn't you review Novelty? Because the review is already there, it’s excellent, and it’s written by one of the few enlightened minds on Debaser. Super, Savory was covered by an Italian band in 2007... nobody noticed this tribute. I'll send you a private message! Obviously, Grippo isn’t a 5, but no problem.
Pino Daniele Terra mia
Voto:
I listened to the vinyl again. It takes less time to listen to it than to read the review, so it’s a crappy review. Second, it's a didactic review. ā€œTerra miaā€ is not didactic at all... sad lyrics to cheerful music, social denunciations uplifted, and instead here’s a nice little page that seems to talk about some abstract, melancholic music outright... a crappy review. Can I say it or will I be called vulgar in 2008 because I say shit and fuck? Enea, the only vulgar thing is being, like you, a bigoted pain in the ass who writes reviews identical to their own personality about stupid, vulgar, and trivial things. Is that okay for you or should I throw a couple of fucks in there so you can then tell me I’m vulgar? Enbar doesn’t write poorly. There are reviews of his that I like, which talk about things Debaser almost snubs by principle... like the ā€œgiudizio universale,ā€ where there are maybe 5 comments where I give him five... then he also writes nonsense... like this one, which is a crappy review. I’m saying it and I stand by it, and I don’t see why I should be considered vulgar for saying it. Who knows, the mysteries of Enea, but it's clear: before a thought goes through the brain of an idiot, a lot of terrible things must happen (that's a quote from a writer who is surely too vulgar for you). You miss the best, patafisico. And you call him a populist to someone who brought you into this world ;)
Pino Daniele Terra mia
Voto:
So I challenge you. Give me a nice critical analysis of "Ca sta ci Pensa" ...for my ways: 'sti cazzi... ij allucc every minute n'copp e bocc re crietaur ;)