Voto:
ambassador brings no pain... the last comment from happypippo:
Getting back on DeBaser is as easy as drinking a glass of water. Just go to an internet point and open the website. User Vabbè did it. I preferred to contact the staff; and I must say that, despite my replies, I found nothing but laconic sarcasm (I add, in all fairness, that I also wrote a heap of insults to Malloy that I don't intend to withdraw because he abused his power). Now I ask Alessio to publish this post for me. The last one; transparent as my profile, which has my name, surname, photo, and cell phone (Vabbè instead…). I hope all my friends from DeBaser won't be upset if I choose Bartleboom's post as far as I'm concerned; beyond the excessive esteem regarding my knowledge (for me, 2+2 equals 3.17), it dwells on my bad character. A negative quality that undoubtedly needs to make me detach from DeBaser. However, I would like to highlight a few things. Apparently, on DeBaser, freedom exists but is limited. In this place of horrors and illuminations, anything can be posted; comments, reflections, calm controversies, burps, farts, blasphemies. But the staff members are off-limits. Malloy's behavior is proof of that. Don't bother trying to use abuse@debaser.it: it's a waste of time. The knife has the handle facing the staff: if there really were administrators on DeBaser who intended to maintain a regime of correctness within the site, then banning would be a common practice. Remember the various threats from Vic Sorriso? Remember the craziness of other users like that wicked Miciatigre, a pathological case of acute vaginitis? They roam unpunished between one review and another; it doesn't matter, in either case, DeBaser is getting more clicks. I asked the staff for a quick deletion of my work but I notice that my work is still available. This is an abuse: if a user can no longer engage with a site, it is unfair to use their work. I requested a copy of my work due to the ban because I need it for another publication, but I haven't received anything. I pointed out that, if I wanted to proceed legally, there are so many precedents to my behavior that the ban would constitute an abuse. Response: sarcasm, irony, a grammatical correction from one Andrea I don't remember who pretends not to know who I am. A suspicion: have you ever thought that among the various editors there might be some fakes hiding? The pride of being one of the most clicked sites is worth a few tricks. Or not? But these are just conjectures. Think about it, though...
What I want to communicate here is that I, for my part, do not wish to return to DeBaser, ever again. For two reasons: my irascibility (yes Bartleboom, the anger towards contemplation was madness, you're right, but now we are friends just as I am on good terms with Flinstone). Second: DeBaser does not play by fair play rules. There are no double standards. Falsehoods are not spoken, as the dandy NickghostDrake did. One does not awaken only when called upon, as Malloy does. Offelè, do your job. And if you can't do it, leave it be. Now I have a pleasant private correspondence with Vabbè. My goal was to drag him into my private mail to get him out of my hair. But Vabbè doesn’t get there right away. He wants my blood and also wants me to spend money on travel, lodging, and his medical care. In response to my humor (if you notice, between me and him, the difference is that I know how to joke; he always sticks to the same track like a minotaur in heat), he always responds with the same old tune. Now he will tell me that I whined to the staff to be readmitted. "Things like: happyshit, little poop, I'm waiting for you give me day and place and you went to cry on debaser. I was in a criminal asylum (how he can work in a public place is unknown...) He always gives me news about DeBaser, he’s really dear: he lets me know that everyone hates me and that aside from a fool or two, everyone wants me down the drain. Okay: last two things. Apolo
