alessioIRIDE

Yes, but how boring we are talking about these things!!! Let's talk about serious stuff: after breakfast, I had a nice cigarette. Maybe inspired by Luca Giurato's face, I went to the bathroom and gave birth to a monster. It looked a bit like the singer from the Arctic Monkeys, only it was more tanned. How about you? Is everything okay? Is your bowel regularity working well?

Well, here’s a fact for you: if there's a crisis, the state intervenes. To intervene means to disrupt the guiding principle of classical economics, which states that the market should not be influenced. If left alone, the market will be able to rebalance itself. I'm not calling you ignorant (I don’t know you)... I'm simply presenting you with a fact. The America you know today exists thanks to state intervention. The England you know today exists also because of state intervention (I’m thinking of the turnpike bills). The same goes for France and Italy. In Italy, it happened a bit haphazardly because the money from the Marshall Plan was initially not used to balance the state budget... and guess what: the Americans got angry because that money, as John Maynard Keynes thought, shouldn’t be hidden under the mattress, but rather invested to create jobs, savings, and investments. Think what you want, but this is a fact: when the market struggles, economic planning arises, and this goes beyond any temporary government, and economic planning is something very, very, very, very, very, very, very not right-wing.

that's not the point. you're making yourself the instigator and that's not the case. the principle behind communism (to put it simply, otherwise it would take a book and I wouldn't even be able to do it) is Marxism, but communism is not Marxism. in Marx's writings, there is no dogma regarding killings or nations. on the contrary, what permeates the concept is precisely an anationality. He doesn't say kill yourself, but live. for example, he believed that communism would emerge in England because it needed the driving force of the overproduction crises typical of capitalism and economic cycles. the most famous is that of the stock market crash of '29. now, do you know how states reacted to that crisis? with state intervention and economic planning, which are not exactly right-wing things or symbols of liberal economics. the New Deal is a VERY COMMUNIST thing done by an American. it may seem paradoxical, but it's not. the truth is that anyone with a minimum of political culture knows where good and evil lie. when you're struggling, you turn to planning. why? maybe because the free market is a monster that freely kills us? you see, this is what I'm talking about, not about killings, but about life, and in a different way, superkangaroo touches on it too (at least I believe) when discussing cultural movements. no one is justifying exterminations because the judgment there comes by itself. I'm not talking about death, but about life, and the forced precariousness we will be subjected to for our entire lives is it not killing a person? doesn't it resemble the abolition of the unions that Mussolini enacted? do you know what happened when he abolished the unions? industrial production grew without any technical improvement in the plants. rather than investing, I make those who work bleed. that's all.

Well, if you don't try to understand your own problems (Italy), what hope do you have of understanding those who don't even speak your language?

Everything you want, the horrors committed are horrors. They disgust me too, what do you think? But that’s not the point. We are talking about a thought and we are talking about a practice. I invite you, if you haven't already, to read Marx and, why not, as in Superkangaroo, the prison notebooks. I don’t want to justify a wrong practice with the thought that inspires it, but the thought behind it is really different. What is behind Nazism? There is no messianic thought, but only a desire to serve one’s economic and political interests. Nazism is often understood solely from the perspective of the act, but what is truly shocking is the economic motive. The recovering German economy in an autarkic system needed an outlet market, and the rest of the peoples were seen as a market to seize. This is written in Mein Kampf (which should also be read)... and as for the Duce, I won't speak out of modesty. What a useless people, we weren't even capable of having a madman, but just a fool at the mercy of events.

Yes, there's everything you want. But you need to argue. From which perspective are they equal? Economic, political, social? Above all, leave Stalin out of it, and not just because I say so. Because this is how the study of twentieth-century politics unfolds. The Stalin period is Stalinism.

Alright, since there's a level playing field, I have to create a fake account called FascioAlRogo and only post reviews on partisan songs. But how ignorant is someone who claims that communism and fascism are the same thing?

I really liked it a lot.

Since I got it, I listen to nothing else. PURE RAVISHMENT

you've broken the fuck. YOU AND THEM