mien_mo_man

DeRank : 2,02 • DeAge™ : 6746 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 22 january 2007
Voto:
Is it possible that someone hasn't read it at all?
Voto:
Is it possible that someone hasn't read everything, like, at all?
Voto:
Is it possible that someone hasn’t read properly?
Voto:
Is it that perhaps I didn't explain myself well?
Voto:
Isn't there anyone who notices that I absolutely do not believe it's possible for such junk to have become part of music history?
Voto:
Do you not see that I consider march music as a more "NOBLE" genre, not referring to my personal taste, but rather to the history of pop and its evolutions?
Voto:
I say: don't the connoisseurs of world music present on DeBaser notice that I'm proposing a paradox?
Voto:
"This genre is nonsense," seems to assert the curly-haired one while humming, "and since they're all idiots, I’ll fool them (and take their money) and make a song so stupid that no one has ever heard anything more stupid than this." And he actually succeeded, we would say! The problem is that the British march, this nonsense of a musical subgenre, is the most noble thing produced by pop in the last fifty years!
Voto:
holly valance, olivia newton-john, kylie minogue, danii minogue, i crowded house, gli in.x.s., the husband of nicole kidman, i wolfmother, i JET, i SAVAGE GARDEN, the vines, i MEN AT WORK...
Similar users
Massimof

DeRank: 0,53

dEDOLUZ

DeRank: 0,08

reverse

DeRank: 3,59

iside

DeRank: 20,49

Mike76

DeRank: 1,28

donjunio

DeRank: 7,00

Fidia

DeRank: 5,30

Francescobus

DeRank: 2,46

misterNo

DeRank: 0,05