mien_mo_man

"If I gave 5 stars to the film, it means I liked the direction, the cinematography, etc." So why didn't you just review the film by giving it 5 stars and not writing anything? It was clear from the stars you gave. In the first comment, the one where I gave you 1, I would have asked you, "WHAT DID YOU LIKE ABOUT THE DIRECTION?" because it was clear that you liked the direction (it was evident from the 5 stars, and you specified that you liked it in your post in response to me). BUT WHAT DID YOU LIKE ABOUT THE DIRECTION? (and I've asked you this twice) WHAT DID YOU ENJOY ABOUT THE CINEMATOGRAPHY? AND WHAT DID YOU LIKE ABOUT THE PERFORMANCE? I don't want to know from you whether you liked the direction, the cinematography, the screenplay, the performance, etc. I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHY YOU LIKED THEM. In other words, I would like to read not just you complimenting the film, BUT YOU REVIEWING THE FILM and explaining to me and the world that this film has great direction because..., and beautiful cinematography because..., and so on. Is this clear?

done

I understand you were joking, but why don't you just buy Todd Rundgren's albums yourself? Beyond the masterpieces or the notable records, even in the unresolved albums there are very significant, beautiful, and courageous tracks. And not everyone agrees with me; many consider this CD very good, just as they rate a lot of the stuff I criticized much better than I did. Perhaps even the albums I dismissed might appeal to you more: it all depends on taste.

Hey, you see that this gentleman, in any case, has created quite a few masterpieces, both solo and with his band. What's wrong if I make his discography? We can't just have the discographies of Queen and Pink Floyd, or, to be more intellectual, of Pink Floyd. And you would agree with me that there’s more to recover from the forgotten realm of the '70s than just Cressida.

everyone except for the next one, which is also the last one I will review by Rundgren.

Although I am not an editor, I would like to remind everyone who, given the return of Portishead, might be about to review their latest work or previous albums, that in the list of music genres available before posting the review, there is also the category BRISTOL SOUND. This way, among other things, we can save ourselves some lessons in etymology applied to music.

Thank you for the paraphrase, but where's the review? I mean: did you like the directing? I would say yes, since you gave the film 5 stars... but WHAT DID YOU LIKE ABOUT THE DIRECTION? The cinematography, the acting, the rhythm of the narrative... What does this film have to deserve 5 stars? The fact that it talks about Guevara? And if Guevara was played by Christian De Sica and Granado by Massimo Boldi, would it still be the same? And if the director wasn't Salles but Vanzina, would it still be deserving of 5 stars?

Sorry, but had you already written one about junta before? Because when I click on the Phish, two of your reviews for the same album pop up (the first of which doesn't open).

here you go.

What a pain in the ass this film is. It feels like it was made by a papaboy. No one has the guts to review "Un'altra giovinezza," the return of F.F. Coppola, THE TRUE AND ONLY MASTERPIECE OF 2007?