mien_mo_man

I don't know, guys... now I'm someone who shouts, someone who gets deceived... I give up, I'll leave you as you are... whoever believes that defeating rich criminals is more important than becoming rich himself is right; whoever thinks that if he becomes rich he becomes worse than others is right; whoever believes that money is evil (as if money had its own personality) is right... Everyone is right, because the human brain will only provide (even at the cost of producing-inventing) reasons that confirm its own way of thinking. Reality, in short, cannot do without the perspective of the observer. In string theory, in quantum physics, and in the studies of Max Planck, the inventor of "The Matrix," it's called the OBSERVER. The external reality reflects the internal reality, what is inside us. When I used to read books like Bancopoli, La Casta, Grillo, Travaglio, and Gomez, and only watched Report and Santoro, I believed the world was crap, and the more I looked around, the more I found confirmations... Then I read La fine è il mio inizio by Tiziano Terzani, and then I understood many things, starting with the fact that the ideal of a fair distribution, of a democratically shared happiness, is a failure because like it or not, man is still an animal and needs to create competition, establish a hierarchy. And if we take money out of the world, there will always be someone who has more sheep, more land, more camels, more inches of dick, etc.... It's the ego, the animal part that's in us... So why take it out on money? Why blame money and the much broader concept of wealth, when the basic rules that govern our coexistence today correspond to the same rules that governed the Mbumba Mbimba tribe 600 thousand years ago, when instead of money, they used the shit of a tyrannosaurus? I repeat (shouting and ranting): however you think, you are right. But I think that money is a thing, and a thing cannot do harm. And I too, as an observer of my reality, am right. Does electricity do harm? If I use electricity to dry my hair, electricity saves me from colds and rheumatic pains in my neck. But if I were to use electricity to kill one of you in the electric chair, then electricity becomes bad. A knife is useful for cutting bread, but if I use it to stab my cousin, whose fault is it, the knife??? And money is the same... If you have a good heart and have money, then you become a great benefactor; otherwise, if you are a piece of shit person, you keep it in until you are one of many, and you do it for façade reasons; then, once enriched, you show yourself for what you really are (after all, there is money that helps you gain the respect that you don't deserve). At that point, you are really what you are... If you are a piece of shit as a rich person, it's because you were a piece of shit as a poor person too, only maybe you held back from showing it around out of fear of not being accepted in society. So if there is a bad rich person, it’s because the badness was always inside him, like a sort of disease incubating inside an organism... Money, after all, would just be an "AMPLIFIER": if you love to travel and have money, you will travel not to Croatia but to the most remote destinations; if you love being helpful, you will become a great benefactor; if you’re a piece of shit, you will do all sorts of things; if you love playing tennis, instead of having Pietro Pilazza as your trainer, you’ll have Andre Agassi. The former partner of the guy from Microsoft loves rock music, and instead of playing with his middle school buddies, he invites the Rolling Stones, Aerosmith, the survivors of '68, etc. Now, if you don’t want to make money because it’s deplorable or because you know you’re potential pieces of shit ready to manifest in all their horror once you earn a few bucks, then that’s your business. Sorry for this yet another megamessage... After this, I swear, by the law of compensation, I will never intervene again in any review or in any way. I w

<<(...) although millions of people around the world dream of living comfortably, accumulating great wealth, and having an extraordinary and fortunate life, they fear that this can only be achieved at the expense of others or by disregarding their noblest spiritual values and virtues. In other words, they do not believe they can profit and aspire to paradise. Some even outwardly express their desire for wealth, but then that same wealth makes them feel guilty inside. Many of these people imagine that the accumulation of riches turns into something evil: they picture the devil taking hold of them if they make profits, that God will not love them unless they are poor. This inner conflict between the "heavenly" good and the "infernal" profit serves as a brake on both their spiritual growth and their material growth, creating a nearly paralyzing poverty complex that stifles opportunities and fortunes from the outset. Others assert that what they want is a quiet, secure life and that they are not interested in accumulating vast fortunes. This line of reasoning not only prevents them from ascending to new levels of financial freedom, but also holds them back from living their most inspired and precious dreams. Beyond the conflict between their spiritual nature and their material nature, some people live in a constant internal struggle between the desire to give and the desire to receive. From a spiritual perspective, they wish to be altruistic and care for their neighbors by giving, yet at the same time they feel an opposing and equally strong materialistic and narcissistic desire to receive. In their deepest spirit, these individuals believe that it is better to give to others than to themselves. They still need to learn how to integrate these two opposing forces into a single balanced tension that enables them to build solid financial foundations. Just as the economy of a nation requires supply and demand to thrive, so too must all individuals learn to give and receive. When these two components are consciously balanced, the power derived from it is enormous. (...). This book was born to awaken you and help you discover the true nature of wealth and fulfillment. It will teach you to think about and take care of money, to respect and understand it, and will help you confront all the prejudices and beliefs that may interfere with your destiny and your right to profit.>>

Precisely, LAROCK, you say it yourself... I mean, you agree with me... How can you agree with me? Simple! You mentioned two Europeans, a Welshman and the other a Teuton, if I'm not mistaken. Why don’t you get to know Master Thomas Troward (by the way, very Christian), an American judge born in Punjab to British parents, who worked extensively in the Indian region and lived and taught in England once his professional career was over? Here’s the link to Wikipedia: Thomas Troward - Wikipedia For him, being rich means being with God. Remember the parable of the three talents... Which was the Lord's favorite son? The one who was starving, the little saver, or the one who got rich???? AND LET'S STOP BELIEVING THAT BEING POOR IS MORE NOBLE, JUST, AND PURE, THAT SUFFERING IS MORE BEAUTIFUL; LET'S BREAK FREE FROM THE INSANE LOGIC OF BEAUTIFUL AND LOSER, OF THE SICK AND BEAUTIFUL: THERE IS A WORLD OF INFINITE ABUNDANCE, AND THIS ABUNDANCE IS THERE FOR ALL OF US. Ah, you said the sun is there and it’s beautiful: but who are you, Sangiorgi from Negramaro or Modugno’s grandson? The sun for free? How much longer??? One day you’ll be so poor that you’ll live in the sewers like they do in Bucharest, and then maybe you won’t even be able to afford the sun...

Ah, it's not that there's anything to get upset about... it's just that if there are old ideas like Carlo Marx on DeBaser, it leads me to believe there’s no hope for this "average audience" that on one hand claims to be alternative and on the other falls into the most banal and stereotypical clichés of socialism at all costs, of the rich who must inevitably be someone who visits prostitutes or who, at sixty, marries the latest Afef... that way of being rich is an old, post-industrial way, just as the minds that produced the concepts expressed in the negative comments dedicated to the book you reviewed are post-industrial. All worn-out, stale, and clichéd. So aligned and covered even in their efforts to be different. Cult? On Sunday I have the PNL exams (I become a Practitioner) and then I’m going to visit Ramtha (do you know him?)

“(…) It seems to me that socialist societies foster a state of eternal impotence among people, because the state subscribes to and guarantees the well-being of the citizens. Creativity loses its momentum because it is no longer a necessary quality for survival. Thus, the system creates a class of people whose creativity is used only to devise ways to exploit the system. As a result, this dead weight burdens those who, out of pride or necessity, actually work.

It seems to me that when one relies on someone else for their sustenance, they automatically sell their soul, entering a condition of slavery. Perhaps the only exception is that of the non-working mother who, by dedicating herself to the family, accepts the loss of a certain economic independence. Without income, there is no freedom, and although it may be fun to dawdle for a while, in the end, one must face their own ineptitude and submission, telling themselves a bunch of lies to maintain a semblance of personal image and value. Ultimately, the lack of personal worth or the charisma of self-sufficiency appears in life through various unpleasant incidents filled with negativity that confirm the discomfort brewing beneath the surface.

If those considered powerless were detached from the breast of the government that nourishes them, we would be astonished to see how they would rush to work the very next day. This is because, even though these people have a legitimate interest in maintaining a façade of circumstances that render them powerless, they are, at the same time, not inclined to starve. The problem is that the systems developed in Europe and the United States are not easy to dismantle because the people receiving various subsidies (38 million in the USA) are also voters. No politician can step up to the podium and speak the truth. Moreover, politicians have a natural tendency to hand out money left and right. First, it serves to gather votes, and then it’s not their money.

But in the end, these socialist societies will crumble because the weight of this ever-expanding “generosity” is causing the collapse of world economies. Interestingly enough, it will not be the economy of this absurdity that brings them down; rather, it will be the metaphysics and psychology of socialism that will eventually alter the system.

Each of the people who is currently coddled and supported is, deep down, aware that they are accepting the metaphysical weakness that is imprinted in their way of thinking by the psychology of impotence. This ultimately creates a society in which people feel that everything is impotence and that life is devoid of meaning. This kind of insipid and empty emotion is emanated from the psyche of individuals, and it begins to change the external circumstances of life. Thus, these individuals fall into an ever-deepening spiral of apathy that numbs the mind and seek any respite they can find. Consequently, drugs, violence, alcohol, and casual sex become the only escape routes. As morality changes, our societies deteriorate, and, in the end, there is no way to alleviate the discontent. The discomfort becomes self-perpetuating because the enthusiasm and charisma of self-sufficiency, which would allow people to feel engaged, to feel that they are worth something, that they could contribute to making the world a better place, do not exist.”

you, who would be an exclamation mark that doesn't have the guts to cross a round parenthesis, who dares to mock a genius, a superior being like Wilde? Then at this point, you might as well try to impress by mocking Rol, Francis Bacon, the Count of Saint-Germain, and Cagliostro... In fact, why not go for Jesus Christ while you're at it? Why not spout nonsense like "Jesus Christ would have been the greatest gladiator of the entire Roman Empire: every time they killed him, he came back to life!" Come on, why not mock the Madonna and Saint Joseph too? Go on, you who are the most foolish of commentators, why not keep playing the tough guy without knowing anything about anyone? Do yourself a favor: BLEACH YOURSELF.

We must consider the current state of affairs. In the present circumstances, it’s clear that most super-rich individuals have become such thanks to the Russian oligarchy, certain governmental systems that have created nomenclatures, post-imperialist legacies, the last nobles, politico-mafioso systems, the exploitation of oil in nations where it’s enough to chant Allah Allah to have everyone on your side supporting you, even though you’re richer than God and they’re dying of starvation... And these things work here in Italy too, so it's not a fifth world country, where a fat man, a hunchback, or a little person says "freedom" or says "God" or "family" or "church, God, family and Libertas" and everyone votes for him. Then if he kisses Riina or makes deals with Provenzano, if he goes to prostitutes and/or trans people while his wife pretends to be oblivious until the scandal breaks... then you end up thinking that one can become rich and powerful only in this way.

But that’s not the case. There are places in the world where it is possible to become someone and create something without cheating others and forcing them to succumb. And those places are the USA, a land, after all, of many miserable people, from the arriving English to the Chinese working on the railroads, to the African Americans to today’s Mexicans. A land of the outcasts from all over the world, even of us Italians. There, the idea of social climbing is not only possible but is also a deeply rooted cultural fact. That’s why their constitution speaks of PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS and not just SEARCH, but specifically PURSUIT, meaning a CONSCIOUS SEARCH THAT WILL LEAD TO ACHIEVEMENT (even Muccino explains this to you in his film, and if Muccino understood it, the one from "give me one last kiss please 2 - the revenge of the stealthy tongue"....) A search that, if carried out with the right principles and the right state of mind, can only lead to success, whatever the object of one’s aspirations may be, whether it’s money or love or health, etc.... The USA, as much as we all feel like Americans, is a very different land from ours, a land where Freemasonry (and partly also lobbies) are considered "good," unlike Gladio!!! and where the super-capitalist system has placed the life of every single American citizen directly in their own hands. So, it’s not the entrepreneur who fired me, the politician who made a promise and didn’t keep it, the one who sold me the wrong scratch card, etc.... But only individual responsibility.

I'LL LEAVE ANOTHER GEM FOR YOU MISCREANT DEBASER FRIENDS: A BOOK, CENSORED BY THE HOLY ROMAN CHURCH FOR OVER 50 YEARS (AND WE ALL KNOW HOW YOU ARE ALL ANABAPTIST CHURCH-EATERS IN THE STYLE OF LUTHER BLISSET PROJECT). THE BOOK THAT INSPIRED NONE OTHER THAN BILL GATES: "THINK AND GROW RICH" BY NAPOLEON HILL. IF THE POPES HATED IT, IT MEANS THE TRUTH CONTAINED IN IT IS TRULY REVOLUTIONARY. WHO KNOWS, MAYBE ONE DAY SOMEONE AMONG YOU WILL THANK ME (PERHAPS GIFTING ME A FEW MILLION EUROS ONCE THEY'VE GOTTEN RICH). I DO ALL THIS BECAUSE I LOVE MY NEIGHBOR AND DEBASER.

@ LARROCK (I’m not mad at you, just to be clear: it’s just that you give me ideas for further reflection) One person from whom Bardolla has taken a lot is the millionaire Robert T. Kiyosaki, a Japanese-Hawaiian author of the concept of "FINANCIAL EDUCATION," to the extent that his board game "CASHFLOW" has become mandatory in schools in America... Kiyosaki recounts how, as a pilot officer in Vietnam and the son of a prominent university rector in Hawaii, he found himself poor and spent his last 200 dollars on a money management course. It's clear that not everyone who attends seminars will become rich, but I recommend reading his famous book (unknown in Italy and Europe, SUPERMEGABESTSELLER in America) "RICH DAD POOR DAD" to get a clearer idea. Perhaps the fact that he is an American, that he has written with Donald Trump, that he doesn't hold seminars in Italy, and that he doesn't sell info-products in Italian except for his books, will allow you to have a less emotionally involved perspective. As for the discussion about those whom Alfio Bardolla would spit on... Well, I’m friends with one of them who works in Bardolla’s sales team... He used to be a medical representative, covering kilometers and working 24 hours. Now he knows half of Italy, has a profoundly renewed understanding of himself and the world, makes money because while he works he attends workshops and learns tactics and strategies; if Bardolla wants to do business and is looking for partners, he is one of the first to hear about deals (which don’t exist in Italy, but INVESTMENT CLUBS in America are a consolidated reality), and just with forex he rakes in about 2000 euros every month. The people who work with Alfio Bardolla, as well as those who hold seminars, are not people who are beneath: they are currently positioned below Bardolla, but they all intend to climb up (they may be under Bardolla at the moment, but that doesn’t mean they will stay there forever). Those who are beneath are my fellow citizens from Termini Imerese, who are fed up with going on strike every five seconds... Well, these people are so last that, faced with the inevitable, the only thing they know how to do is protest... If there weren't any social assistance, politicians making endless promises, layoffs, and social safety nets, you would see these people not wasting time but running (and with renewed enthusiasm) to rebuild their lives... Instead, what do they do? They make do as best as they can, end up working as switchboard operators, and then find themselves on the street with five months of unpaid salary. And these are the men? Have you read the text on my presentation page? It’s by the master Stuart Wilde, a guy who simply walks through walls, and the book from which this is taken is titled "TO MAKE MONEY YOU JUST NEED A LITTLE," but there are also a ton of other books like this, all written by philosophers and spiritual teachers (Yogananda, for example, or the metaphysics graduate Joe Vitale). Those who attend Bardolla’s seminars, on the same day, if they are interested, can become his business partners... If I had had more financial availability, I would gladly have invested in his Arnold's Cafés in Milan! Absolutely I would have done it!!!

LARROK: 4% of the world's population owns 96% of global wealth. The planet's surface is so vast that each of us human beings could live in a house the size of the White House in Washington... AND YET... Yet, if we distributed wealth (monetary and otherwise) fairly, the same wealth would RETURN EXACTLY INTO THE HANDS OF THAT 4% OF THE POPULATION within ten years or less.
Why???? Because wealth has little to do with luck, just as it has little to do with how friendly you are with the prime minister or the powerful... Wealth is a way of thinking. Thinking of being truly active, that is, seeking to learn new things, leads you to also look for new ways to make money, etc.