Fenrir

Ah, but for the repetition, it was just a suggestion. It might be true that only a brutalaro appreciates the group, but the review is good regardless, so it's for everyone.

"the orthodoxy shall not kill me for this." No, I’ll take care of it.

I agree with almost everything, except for 1000 Poits of Light, a nice song in my opinion, much better than Sacreds Cowboys. The ideas for Bruce are there, we just need to wait for consolidation...

I wanted to do it myself, damn it! The funny thing is that it's well written too; I don't feel like making pointless duplicates.

Damn, it's hard to write, okay, but I hadn't encountered difficulties in reading like this before. Sorry for this cluelessness (I repeat: regardless of being a metalhead or not).

Just out of curiosity, vortex (maybe it's none of my business): have you ever heard this album?

@Ole: this is new! For being 15 years old, he writes nice reviews. As for the grammar: I’m writing quickly in the hope that sooner or later I’ll get to eat, and if I don’t have a dictionary nearby, the messes you see come out :-). Actually, I take the opportunity to apologize, you have to decipher it yourself! :-D @Guedo666: maybe reread the reviews, you can avoid unnecessary repetitions ;-)

And who does punk appeal to? Are there more metalheads or punks? Your problem (for me) is judging a person based on the genre they listen to. I don’t consider myself that superficial, and I don’t think it’s strange for someone who listens to metal. Just as you seem quite intelligent to me. So why do you stoop to criticize "regardless"? Every genre has its deeper side; there are those who are interested in it and those who settle for the surface. As for the rest, I agree that punk can be more violent than metal, and I also like your point about books.

@vortex. Come on, seriously, you have to chime in too. I get it, you don't like that brutal is considered tougher than punk, but you're becoming ridiculous. You sound like one of those thirteen-year-old metalheads who latch onto a band and obsess over them—"Slipknot are the toughest, yeah, the toughest, the others suck, Slipknot are the prophets." From an outside perspective, you're not any better. Do you think punk produced only geniuses? Do you think there haven't been any mentally challenged people? Do you think metal is all about goat heads and apocalypse? If I compared you, regardless of the context, to those anarchists trying to embody the punk spirit by breaking things and making a mess, would you be okay with that? If I started diving into stereotypes about your genre, would you appreciate it? For you, a third of the people writing reviews on this site (some of them very good) are just brain-dead teenagers?

Oi oi oi, here we go with the usual noise: "it shouldn't sound dangerous," "there's enough violence around," "this is music for teenagers," etc. Music for teenagers? Personally, I've never met a single person under eighteen who listens to brutal, and I completely agree with Vincent Valentine. If someone enjoys listening to violent music, it doesn't necessarily make them a bad, perverse, or emotionally disturbed person (I don’t know how many people the good guy Guedo has slaughtered today) so let’s put an end to that. If I'm in a particular emotional state and I want to listen to Death, I won’t offset it with the news because "there's already too much violence" (at most Emilio Fede when I'm feeling particularly masochistic). It’s music, damn it. It can, relatively, influence personality, but everyone has a brain that works regardless of what they listen to. As for the rap of Fifty and company, the solution isn't to censor the artists in question, but to educate people (the youth, if you like) to think for themselves. This applies to all music. What to absorb, what to consider pure entertainment, and what to take as an example and behavioral model (and I don’t think brutal bands aim for this as a goal).