woodstock

DeRank ™: 5,81

DeAge™ : 7153 days • Here since 9 november 2006

The Rolling Stones Between The Buttons

5 feb 07

Voto:

well well well I see the sitar is sparking debate... I'll go read the review of the Yardbirds. Anyway, I still believe that the sitar is present in at least 2 songs. If not, what instruments are they? @Zarathustra: I think that the Rolling Stones, apart from being THE GREATEST in rock, also excelled in Psychedelia, led by Jones who in '67 probably expressed the best of himself. And it can be said that psychedelia derives from LSD, and we know how much both the Beatles and the Stones cherished it...

The Rolling Stones Between The Buttons

3 feb 07

Voto:

read the last 3 lines, from: "in the entire album..." to "not by chance the true protagonists of the work." and anyway I didn’t want to start a discussion, it was just about the usual attitude I see in the OTHER reviews...

The Rolling Stones Between The Buttons

3 feb 07

Voto:

I don't know who the hell you are, but you're (partially) right. It's better to confront than to argue.

The Rolling Stones Between The Buttons

3 feb 07

Voto:

Alright, I admit I got confused... anyway, the sitar was essential for both Harrison and Jones; it's no coincidence they were the first to successfully introduce it in that "experimentation" scene of those years. And then it seems I've implied that Jones is the protagonist of the record, precisely because of its unusual nature. Or not?

Pooh - La Nazionale Italiana Di Calcio Cuore Azzurro

3 feb 07

Voto:

What the hell is this crap?

The Rolling Stones Between The Buttons

3 feb 07

Voto:

Okay, maybe I exaggerated by saying it's in the whole album, but in "yesterday's papers" and "cool calm and collected," the sitar is there and you can hear it.

Duncan James Future Past Italian Edition

14 dec 06

Voto:

yeah...

Duncan James Future Past Italian Edition

14 dec 06

Voto:

But does people know what they're getting into? Well...

Simply Red Picture Book

9 dec 06

Voto:

But what is it that needs to be reviewed? What are the GREAT reviews and the excellent reviewers? If there are 4 reviews of the same album, is it bad to try to change and make a different one? I believe that in the world there isn't only EXCELLENT music, but also good music, and anyway it's a subjective matter.
In any case, as I expected, there hasn't been any serious critique of the album (maybe one), but the usual meaningless chatter insulting people. Congratulations.

Simply Red Picture Book

8 dec 06

Voto:

I hope that this time the review and the actual value of the group are taken into account, not that if someone reviews Pink Floyd they receive applause and if they review Jovanotti or Simply Red it turns into crap (the review).