thetrooper

In a greatest hits, you don’t put more than 3 or 4 stars if there are rarities or live tracks! When I made the one for Sepultura, I even messed up the star ratings or else it would have been 3!

Detailed reception but too "emphatic" (I think that's how you say "enfatica," right?)! I haven't listened to the album and I know Edguy by name!

I can't find the Liege Lord Bartleboom, what can I use to download them? Anyway, I did a track by track review because in my old review of "the essential" by the Maiden, I was criticized for not talking about the music but just mentioning the songs, so... and anyway, "Vol.4" is Progressive Rock, many critics say so, and indeed the songs are less "hard" than the first three albums, but still magical!

The record is good, but there are things that are already known (like I must have heard a thousand times that "Bored" is like "Blind," but never mind). Anyway, what can I say about the album? Aggressive and melodic at the same time, a fitting sound, and the song with the legendary Max Cavalera is tough (he’s great!). However, they are still many steps below the Korn, no offense! Bye!

They are not my favorite group! That title goes to the Irons!

I don't know if you can still hear me: alright, I admit it: I made a huge mistake! "Vulgar Display of" isn't the best album of the '90s, I was a bit caught up in the excitement, but can I at least say it's one of the best of the '90s? Please respond, I want to apologize for the mistake!

I know that no one is listening to me anymore anyway 1) I didn't point out Korn and Soulfly as heirs of Pantera, I just said that their groove has been used by the aforementioned bands 2) damn, find me another heavy metal album better than "Vulgar Display Of Power" in the '90s, don't throw the black album or progressive or black metal at me or I'll shoot myself! 3) I thank axlspark for standing up for me and I agree with everything he said about age! 4) the riff in "New Level" is very similar to Kerry King's riffs on "South of Heaven," and if you're deaf, that's not my fault 5) those so-called tough kids and pseudo-metalheads? Are you kidding me? The metal audience has always been the same, those were metalheads who saw Maiden in '85, those are metalheads who see In Flames today, and those will be metalheads who go to see Mastodon when they are popular like Metallica and Slayer, damn this is how metal gets ruined, with the fights among these damn factions! Why do we have to criticize everything that's different? Sorry for this outburst, I don't even know what I'm saying, sorry! Bye!

An album that doesn't reach the beauty of "Korn" by Korn, but is still a good example of rap metal! Fake Revolutionaries, this YES! Confusing review, talks about everything (other albums and DVDs) except for the album.

Guys, don’t get hung up on the adjectives because, all in all, we could invent the genre Gothic Pop/Rock, because that’s what Evanescence are! The album is nice, one of those pleasant and lively ones, but take away the stunning voice of the singer and you’re left with three idiots, so I give the album a 3, and the review a 2, not because I didn’t like it; on the contrary, it’s written quite well, but the huge blunder at the beginning when she mentioned the Maiden really disgusted me! When the Irons wrote gems like "Running Free" or "Sanctuary," Amy Lee wasn’t even born yet! And then the critics unfairly shot down the latest Maiden, so I don’t see all this attention; attention, fame, and popularity for the Maiden come from their countless fans who literally stormed the Datchforum in Italy, singing the new songs at the top of their lungs!

The track by track is a bit confusing (in my opinion), but all in all, you’ve been quite thorough about the album. I haven’t listened to it, and I don’t think I will; from what you say, they seem like the usual nu metal band trying to copy from names that are quite different, like Limp Bizkit and Fear Factory, without a hint of originality. Nevertheless, degustibus!