sorciopeloso

But why are there always geniuses who write eighty posts on a single review without saying a single sensible word?

The implied author as the agent complement?! Are you sure it makes sense? Let's reread and analyze: "Eric Martin, although this is his self-titled album ('85), it does not correspond to his solo debut."
There could be ambiguity with "Eric Martin": is it the artist or the album?
Let’s continue: "although this is his self-titled album." These words eliminate any ambiguity: "Eric Martin" refers specifically to the artist, as indicated by "his album" = "album of Eric Martin the artist" ("his" indeed replaces Eric Martin the artist...).
Then it continues like this: "it does not correspond to his solo debut": the "his" in "his debut" can only refer to Eric Martin the artist (since it is artists who debut, not albums): once again, there is no ambiguity about the nature of the name at the beginning of the sentence.
To recap without bringing up strange grammatical theories, the meaning that the above phrase conveys is that the man Eric Martin does not correspond to his solo debut. Then if you are convinced that it is a well-written sentence...

Sorry, you wrote "Eric Martin, although this is his self-titled album ('85), it does not correspond to his solo debut," where the main part is "Eric Martin does not correspond to his solo debut": Does that sound like a sensible sentence to you? You really are hopeless. Just know that saying "I was wrong" has never killed anyone, quite the opposite.

No, we didn't understand each other. What I'm saying is that if you throw around big words randomly, you don't create "figurative concepts," but linguistic horrors that it is more than legitimate to criticize, even with heavy irony, especially after 48 reviews written in this way (the opening of the review is messed up even if it lacks figurative concepts: it’s simply written terribly). And then, please, try to understand that your free insults demonstrate an inability to accept criticism, which is nothing more than a symptom of deep ignorance.

A comment like the one by ishahn in the review of an album titled "serenity" at least brings a smile.

Oh ishahn, since you already brought up the dictionary thing a while ago, are you aware that to speak (or write) a language well, it’s not enough to know individual words, but it also matters how these are chosen and connected (syntactically and logically)?

Yes, I had heard it's a piece of junk, I don't think I'll ever look into it :D

This record shows its age a bit, but I’m willing to overlook that. Frankly, U2 (even the "older" ones) have never seemed exceptional to me; quite the opposite (and anyway, they have little to do with Devo and their music, so I find the comparison a bit forced).

the album is definitely good, but 5 is a bit too much

I will try