cptgaio

Yes, but also mention that I explained why I corrected myself and that you also said they were around a hundred (and there are about seventy).. otherwise it seems like I'm the only one stating inaccuracies.. ;-) Good night to you too.

And in any case, in Miike you didn't accuse me of saying inaccuracies or nonsense, but called me a liar; go reread it if you want, I'm not making anything up, and it's very different. And anyway, in that discussion about the film, it was me talking; the others (including you) limited themselves to calling me a liar, superficial, incompetent, and all for what? For a personal opinion; you’re happy with that... And then I don't like this term "if someone says nonsense," who are you to say it? Your opinion is neither more nor less valuable than any other user’s. It would be better if you dropped that "I know everything" attitude at least if you want a civil and serene discussion; otherwise, keep it up, know that every time you use this tone with me, I will continue to call you rude. If that works for you, it works for me too; let’s keep hurting each other, after all, this is the internet, not real life, and all in all, I'm having fun too. Good night.

my god how bad I wrote..the rush..forgive me..

Of course you're stubborn; if you didn't always start off in a rather aggressive manner, I would talk to you about cinema (I'm tired of repeating this) just like I did with Uxo, Pippo, and Zero (please read the comments above). But if you already start from the perspective that I'm an idiot, why should I care to talk to you? You have your own preconceived idea, which matters little to me because, let me say, someone who starts with these attitudes inspires little dialogue. And by the way, I've never come to tell you (as you did with me) to shut up and that you're talking nonsense, first because I don't think that, I respect all opinions; second because it's not my style. For me, formality and kindness are (almost) everything. Then obviously, if someone attacks me, I defend myself (but I never insult; I dare you to find an insult in my comments). I repeat, write and comment about cinema but let others do so too without calling anyone who disagrees with you an idiot. Bye.

I meant written language, not non-verbal... slip...

P.s. I'm sorry, but this whole story about fraternal f***ing feels a lot like climbing (free) up mirrors, well... honestly, it’s worth what I told you in my review of Miike, we don't really know each other, you can't expect someone to understand when your f***ing is fraternal, it's too easy to offend and then say: "oops, sorry, I was joking...", you see... verbal language has formalities that should be respected, at least that's how I see it, you do as you like.

It's objective that what I think of you is also valid. I don't give ratings randomly but from a personal perspective, so it's natural that many so-called masterpieces don't appeal to me. Honestly, I've never found myself in difficulty, as you can see. With civilized people, I've responded by discussing cinema; with you, it's difficult because you're always rude and offensive. I return the affection. I repeat, I couldn't care less about what you think of me, so do yourself a favor and save your time by calling me a liar, ignorant, etc., like you did in the review of Miike and as you tried to do here before I stopped you, because it's time wasted. To me, you are less than zero, and I think the feeling is mutual, so once again I urge you to not pay any more attention to me, and I will do the same with you. Best regards!

Ah, I'm only seeing Kim's comment now. I didn't say there was rudeness in this debate; I said that you are normally rude. Do you want to deny it?

I'm responding to Zero because he raises valid points without succumbing to provocation. The erudite references may be there, but it's the visual form in which they are presented that I find unappealing. Just because Pasolini is a genius doesn't mean that any reference to him is automatically brilliant. In this case, if they exist, they are unfortunately overshadowed by everything else that (in my personal judgment) falls into bad, redundant taste within just two minutes of the beginning of the thread (it's almost trivial, if you allow me). It shows poor acting and almost no technical skill in direction. I see more "cunning" here aimed at covering a lack of creative depth than in the other directors mentioned above. Goodbye.

So learn to use the singular and the plural: you have always used the latter when referring to terms like superficiality, nonsense, etc. etc. and anyway it’s also the tone you’ve used that’s not right, we are here to talk about cinema not to argue. Go check my comments in other reviews and you will see that where I see the possibility to discuss and not to end up in a deadlock, I never hold back. In my opinion, you have not shown this willingness, so I didn’t see the point in continuing a trench debate. Bye.