cptgaio

Dear Gate: it seems that you misunderstood the meaning of my comment; it wasn't a criticism but a paraphrase of your "we could discuss it." Anyway, to avoid misunderstandings, I apologize for any "second meaning" you might have inferred. As for the rest of what you say, I'll take a cue from Russell: not everything is relative. It is not, for instance, that the general status of human beings has decidedly improved (in all fields) compared to any past era; just pick one at random, even if it cannot be said that it is now "perfect" (it probably never will be: also because every generation, often wrongly, considers its own time the worst of all). This leads me to believe that, unless "traumatic events" come into play, humanity is destined to become more and more empathetic and altruistic. As for the rest, I don't know you, so I can't say whether you are one of the "superior people" as Russell meant, but seriously, does it matter? :-D Bye.

@Gate: "Many 'superior' people love to say that everything is relative: obviously, this is nonsense because if everything were relative, there would be nothing left to relate to" (Bertand Russell) @Popcornshooter: it would be inflicting harm and it doesn't belong to me. @Ghigno92: The first and second sentences of your comment are slightly contradictory, if I'm not mistaken, anyway you're right: the second part is very "scholarly" and indeed wasn't intended because so much has been said about this writing that I couldn't add anything (which happens in 90% of reviews in general and I say this to dear Gate as well). In the end, I included it as a small commentary (not critical) on the poem because otherwise those prankster editors would have sent the review to the "cases" (which usually doesn’t upset me, but I wanted this one in HP). Obviously, this is said without any controversy. One last thing: yes, I could have included more (and not just the things you mention) but it wouldn't have served my purpose: which I believe Bartleboom has sensed. A warm greeting to everyone: beautiful and ugly.

Ability to synthesize and depth of thought (and remarkable critical sense), therefore you are the best reviewer this site has ever had. I also give the album a 4 for the memories.

The mere presence of "Heavy Metal Lover" (for now, the dance song of the year as far as I'm concerned) earns the album a passing grade. The review is disgraceful.

P.S. Thank you to all the attendees.

"that it is not a band shriveled on their historic trademark": obviously I had to write (and wanted to) "on its trademark of..."

Certo, invia pure il testo e procederò con la traduzione.

In the Italian Pop scene, it’s definitely the least bad (that doesn’t mean it’s completely redeemable...) Unfortunately, it also has a rather spontaneous unlikability and that dose of cunning that will never allow me to appreciate it on principle (I know I have a bad temper): this doesn’t mean that many 1s on this page weren’t given arbitrarily.

It deserves respect, but this album is really bad... (2 for the respect, it would be 1)

Certo, invia pure il testo e procederò con la traduzione.