cptgaio

Everything is very beautiful.

I like them, good review, maybe a bit too brief.

Thank you, Dante! For the list, go to the link I placed on the right side of the review (fan site). Browsing through this site, you will also find a list that I believe is complete. Alternatively, IMDb also has a reliable one. Bye!

And now you're going around digging through my comments, I challenge you to find one where I offended anyone (or where talking about DT I said: "enough DT!"), so before calling someone an idiot, think twice next time.

what confusion these make me....how can you listen to them??? there's the drummer who seems dumb...they each go their own way....meh.....they just make noise
Dreamtheater | 15/1/2007 | 11:44
Slipknot: Slipknot di coppino
ENOUGH TOOOLLLL!!!!
Dreamtheater | 26/3/2007 | 16:05
Tool: 10000 Days di DreaminGorilla
Gosh, you guys are clueless....my review was very provocative, I expected all this. You, as always, as soon as you read someone who doesn't share the ""magnificent"" Tool, you turn on each other...meh..
Dreamtheater | 7/2/2007 | 15:46
Tool: Lateralus di Dreamtheater

The comment from the user Dreamtheater only confirms my thesis; you are excellent at getting mad when someone touches your heroes, but it's all good when you go around trashing others', right? Only you monomaniacs can understand the DT? Then you’re surprised when others come to annoy you. But do a self-examination (you all) and this is coming from someone who listens to and truly appreciates the DT (and if I may say so, even before you).

El Guevo, you’re really good at flipping omelettes, (point B) I assure you I’ve watched the film carefully and not superficially (point A) (two tricks in one post, how lacking in imagination you are tonight...) then, I never said you were fake intelligent; I said Trier makes fake intelligent films that touch on easy feelings, and I never claimed this type of film must be liked by everyone; I said I don’t like it. You, however, assert that I keep saying nonsense, so I may be contradictory, but you are truly rude (by the way, among all the easy discussions you make, you still need to explain where I have been rude, but I doubt you can do that). Got it? Everything else you say is pure rhetoric, so I’m done with you, not with my friend Puni though... Dearest Puni, I haven’t caught any conspiracy (at least I hope that a nice person like you wouldn’t have dealings with someone like El Guevo, unless you’re the same person, and then I could understand the little theater), you’ve called me an idiot (even if indirectly), do you understand that? I repeat, my issue isn’t a rhetorical or philosophical problem like you’d want to believe, but a matter of respect, that’s it. You can skirt around it as much as you want, but I repeat, the point is that. Regarding the film, I return to it for the umpteenth time because either I’m not explaining myself well, or you’re hardheaded; I didn’t like it because I honestly found it quite banal, grotesquely slow (there are plenty of slow films that I like, but this one is grotesque in how slow it is) and technically inferior compared to others he’s made (even though I haven’t adored them), and I’m not the only one in my infinite cinematic ignorance thinking this (as can be noted from the various comments), there's a large segment of the audience and critics too, so don’t be too scandalized because art has divided minds since the beginning of humanity. Peace!

ih,ih,ih "obviously"

ovaimete was "trucchetti" and not "tuccetti"...

In this regard, I would like to list (for the benefit of newcomers to DeB who may read this page) the main tactics used by the clever users of this site to put their interlocutors in difficulty and induce them to lose their calm, thus offending and automatically switching to the wrong side:
A) to assert that if the interlocutor has certain ideas, it is because they have not watched/listened to the work (album or film), and if they have, it was in a superficial manner.
B) to turn the tables, that is, to direct the same questions received from the interlocutor in previous posts back at them.
C) when pressed, to state that their previous comments were merely a jest and that it is the interlocutor who didn’t grasp the subtle irony.
D) to start asserting phrases like: "I have shown you that I'm right," "you continue to make a fool of yourself in front of everyone," "already in a previous review, I have outmaneuvered you on all grounds" (even when this may have never happened).
E) to cast doubt on the interlocutor’s knowledge and perhaps begin to slyly provoke them with phrases like those from Guevo's last post: "A round of applause for the great moralizer" (great moralizer of what? Just because I told you that some of your attitudes are a bit inappropriate?)
Well, after this, I hope that my application as a human case will finally be taken seriously.