So, in response to 47, I take the opportunity to remind Rivoli that the Cugini di Campagna are indeed a more mature listen, and to the Judge that it's not necessary for him to read every one of my comments since they are heavy for him.
@47: I don't want to annoy anyone, let alone you, whom I respect (I would also respect the Judge but he has embarked on this personal battle in recent weeks with anyone who finds his comments a bit out of place when he should instead reciprocate the respect for the honesty seen in the amount of sycophants that circulate here and in the world in general). However, if we want to be precise, since February 13 of last year (that is, for 1 year), the reviews on Maiden are 20, an average of less than two per month (on DeBaser, an average of 333 reviews appear monthly... it must be truly disturbing for non-Maidenian users to have a frequency of 0.5%!) This average drops even further when considering the last nine months, where there are 11, of which three are mine (so you know who to unleash your crap on, at most). Now, I don’t want to conduct a statistical search on the quantity of actually useful reviews (that aren’t duplicates or otherwise; there are non-duplicated ones that are still useless), but I fear the numbers for any band or genre are fairly aligned with those of the Maiden, which, having a history of at least 30 reviewable items, rises to almost 1/3 (Is it a site for Free Reviews or not? Can one also review the entire discography or not? If not, those in charge should establish new rules). In comparison to DeBaser, this means that out of 17,000 reviews, based on the logics of uselessness (but being more kind because, damn, citizenship to respect others' tastes is a given here, so let's be optimistic), I should find a series of over 10 comments that are either ironically annoyed, which, over time, I remind you, if the type of jokes doesn't vary, it becomes tedious, or deliriously offensive on at least 10,000 reviews, of which at least 9,936 are not about Maiden. Does this happen? I honestly don’t want to check, but I really doubt it. I’m perfectly fine with the fact that Maiden are not liked (and rightly so; I don't think I've ever bothered anyone in cases of divergent musical views) and I'm perfectly fine if you want to put the double 1, go ahead. However, I don’t agree with the excuse used recently to justify the clear existing animosity. Most just want to be a pain for no reason (with little creativity, by the way), and if this is the motivation (and it is), I hope that this "wave" of Maiden reviews (hey, 4 in 15 days, what a squeezing of balls, huh!) develops in a more truly convinced manner because it seems to me that reality (and the figures) shows that the provocation has come from quite another side. Just don't read them; what does it take? You have another 17,000 to read... Look, I'll set a good example: I won't read them and I won't comment anymore either. Bye, dear!
