cptgaio

I won't say anything about the work in question because I haven't read it, but regarding the character Saviano, I'll quote Turkish. As for the review, I can only say that the dangerous syllogism (that it implies) that in Naples you are either like Saviano (and from the writing, it seems like that's the extreme minority) or you're colluded seems a bit risky (at least I hope so). Regarding the issue of crime, if you'll allow me the syllogism that the majority of commentators have conceded to the reviewer, I would propose in Naples that the law enforcement stop everyone who is wearing a helmet while riding a motorcycle because it's known that they are getting ready to do something stupid, as it is known that in Naples normal people don't wear helmets...

But Alessio, if it really is you, Gustavolamazza, you’re disappointing me a bit… Leaving comments on my review, like the ones I’m quoting below, seems to me, at least, somewhat undeserved since I’ve always approached our relationships with a minimum of respect and civility…
GUSTAVOLAMAZZA | Date: 15/8/2008 9:59 | Rating: 1 | Album Rating: 1
Lord of the Rings and Iron Maiden. Let me guess: you’re thirty-five, single (not by choice), and you read a lot of comics. For the series "losers of the world unite"
GUSTAVOLAMAZZA | Date: 15/8/2008 12:18 | Rating: — | Album Rating: —
Sure, a guy who, at forty, still reads Lord of the Rings and listens to Iron Maiden can only pick up a nice bar of soap from the shower floor of the Sulmona prison.

If you had said that Tokio Hotel are garbage, at least (given your age), you would have spoken with a sense of reason rather than just hearsay. Let's leave aside the fact that, from my point of view, it's wrong to consider anything garbage; I would at least talk about albums that I don't like. However, context is everything to truly understand certain things, and it's not necessary to have lived it firsthand, but at least being a bit informed about the history of what you’re talking about would be appreciated, and you really give the impression of knowing nothing about what you’re spitting on, and I don't think I'm mistaken. Anyway, you have time to understand certain things and to educate yourself a bit; I'm sure that sooner or later you'll see my point. I strongly recommend trying to review something; that's where you could start to understand how important it is to give dimension to what you listen to and not just limit yourself to mere listening. Regards, more or less, dear.

Masterpiece.

Well, you keep contradicting yourself in terms: claiming to be here for fun and then trashing something you probably don't understand (given your age, if it's the one you state) is at least reckless and a sign that all the characteristics of someone who takes themselves far too seriously (let’s not even start on the statement "just a thousand records" that reminds me too much of someone who really takes themselves too seriously) are present. Admitting that you messed up would have made you look better, that's all. Take care.

P.s: if there were all this context then: my critique was referring to your phrase about "wasting time" on certain garbage (your words) and I was (by the way, kindly) inviting you not to do it and to dedicate yourself to other things, and you replied that you are only here to mess around, and I (still kindly) told you that your first sentence contradicted this "proclamation of faith." That’s all. If you see another context, you are free to do so: mine was just an invitation to calmness. If you were offended by the term "troll," I'm sorry, but maybe you should have read my critiques more carefully before jumping to a stinging and unconstructive offensive.

Look, just because you insist that I must have misunderstood when the opposite is clear, the label "troll" suits you perfectly. You haven't explained anything; you've just been making excuses. Go in peace.

@Dream: don't waste time because this is a troll.

In fact, it’s been since post 34 that you haven’t grasped the point. But if you still don’t understand, I give up. You’re the one who explained yourself poorly, not others misunderstanding it, think about it, son.
XYZ | Date: 16/10/2008 21:54 | Rating: — | Album Rating: —
Exactly, but who cares about this garbage? With all the masterpieces still to be discovered, is it worth wasting time on this nonsense?

So try to explain yourself better next time, as what is understood from your first comment is what I've told you so far (I won't copy and paste anymore because it seems pointless: if you didn't get it after 2 times...). I suggest you not to get worked up because then people might think you take the site too seriously...