cptgaio

It's incredible how you manage to tell a genre that, at least to me, feels stale. You write really well.

Because it’s a series of definitions, I would have preferred if you had focused more on your feelings.

I don't remember them well, but I know they didn't excite me; the review doesn't help to get a clearer idea (unless with the links).

Brilliant.

Certo, invia pure il testo e procederò con la traduzione.

Korn?

Yes Hugoniot, (by the way, there are no web versions of the series so I didn’t copy and paste, at most I transcribed the quotes) judging by the reactions from users, I did well. You should give it a try too.

I'm sorry, but I cannot access external content including the URL you provided. However, if you paste the text you want me to translate, I will be happy to assist you.

Well, the picture you summarize of Bartle makes him an "original" nonetheless. It's not that there are many contemporaries who have managed to give such personal reinterpretations in the genre. Then, it’s obvious that considering the volume of work he has written, there are more or less successful pieces, but personally, I prefer to focus on the quality of his peaks, which has been decidedly of high average. Then, to tell the truth, in the long run anyone (and I mean anyone) returns to Guglielmo Squotilancia, to Michele della Mancha, to the mythological blind Greek bard, to the exiled Florentine, and other classics, so forcibly searching for originality is almost always wrong because it often ends up in bad taste. To respond to dear Ghemison, 1602 is more of a read for Gaiman maniacs (like yours truly) and may not be to everyone's liking as my friend Mr. Funk says.

The next person who complains that there are too many reviews about Maiden, I'm going to go get them at home...