So, I see that instead of behaving like a man (for instance, apologizing since it was you who offended and making that list of names you think would go against you), you continue to act like a child this time taking it out on a clear typo (by the way, you know very well that the list of offenses cannot be reduced to a buffoonery), but since I can be understanding, I will explain one last time what happened: CPTGAIO | Date: 15/11/2008 17:28 | Rating: — | Rating for the Album: —
@Black: on DeB, for editorial policy, "exemplars" who have done far worse than "dirtying" someone's review average haven’t been banned... come on... otherwise it really seems like you’re here just for the nice rating, like in school; do we want to make people believe this?
Regarding the first sentence, I think there’s nothing to say since it's a sacred and objective truth; about the second, which offended you so much, if you were correct (but I know you realize you messed up but aren't humble enough to admit it), you would notice that it contains a hypothesis: I didn't assert that you’re here for the nice rating like in school, but that if you get angry like that, it might be evident, so I conclude with a nice piece of advice in the form of a question (ergo: we don’t want that to happen and to give satisfaction to these fakes, right?) So unless you can distinguish between the meaning of seeming and being, you’ve really gotten this wrong, but never mind, what’s serious is that you started accusing me of things that don't make sense, and in my first response, I pointed this out vehemently, certainly not offensively, and you did nothing but start losing your head and taking it personally (with a couple of inaccuracies that suggest you have serious problems seeing beyond your own nose). Here I pointed out (and I repeat I am polite, not stupid; I notice certain things, they just seem trivial to me and I don't bring them up unless I’m provoked) that complaining about the matter, considering that you’re the first (and for a long time) to purposely lower the averages and leave comments that are more than just pricks (I repeat, it’s all written on DeB: these are facts, not your delusions, honey) in other people's reviews is quite futile (the type of "it's fine as long as I touch others, or others get offended, but don’t touch me: very democratic for someone who goes around calling others 'Bondi'). Unhappy with that, instead of admitting you’ve at least exaggerated, you lashed out in a nonsensical rant calling me a moralizer (curious since you were the only one asking for a ban on someone here) as if I considered it offensive to try to understand others' reasons (before launching into useless insults) and interact kindly...
That said, the conclusions I draw are these: 1) you’re the classic coward who instead of facing situations (and naming those "untouchables" for Diana) lashes out without rhyme or reason at one of the few who nonetheless has the courage to tell you to your face what he thinks and tries to turn against you your same shortcomings (do a check on your conscience): besides, it’s true that maybe it was inappropriate to reveal a private conversation, but it was a legitimate response to your much graver improprieties towards me. 2) You’re too focused on yourself (it’s called egocentrism): if you had read my post well instead of taking it immediately as an insult, you would have understood that it was just advice (not even a criticism: but we know you can’t accept those either). 3) You are of monstrous immaturity (poor thing, your review ratings went down!): instead of responding in kind, you just highlight others' mistakes. 4) You are a hypocrite.
I have nothing else to add, just that the advice is a single one: think well of yourself before throwing mud on others.
