cptgaio

The point is this: these are not lectures, they are honest pieces of advice from someone who, despite all the insults you've thrown at him in this review for a slight that's entirely in your head, cares about you. Then honestly, it's in far different circumstances that I need to prove my moral qualities, I assure you! You can see it however you want, take care.

A respectable position, for heaven's sake, but unfortunately Science and "Paolanesimo" (a name that Christianity should actually bear) are irreconcilable.

P.S. Seriously, you are not well, find someone who can help you, I’m telling you as a friend. Good night and I won’t respond to you anymore seriously because I don’t want to help you keep looking like the unstable person you’re being. Take care.

Always slept peacefully, my dear, and I certainly don't need DeB to boost my self-esteem (I'm not you!). Good night.

Take care, Black (I don't like to be harsh).

I just wanted to weigh in on the review with the worst DeRango on the entire site (even though I still don't fully understand the mechanism...) and indeed it has some rather scandalous content... However, being objectively (because theoretically DeRango should be a system that gets as close as possible to the goal of having an objective ranking, right?) the worst DeB review is still something to take pride in.

Nice record, a review that lives up to it.

In guilty delay, I’m responding to you too: I don’t think wondering why a user comes to your review to offer a (perfectly legitimate) criticism when the same person could be criticized (not by me, I repeat) for the same thing is taking DeBaser too seriously but simply trying to understand a bit more the motivations behind it (in a way that seems polite, not less than yours, at least): that’s all.
Regarding the point that those who come to DeBaser must be ready to accept various comments, I completely agree, but I think it’s also democratic to explain (with proper reasoning and politeness) one’s own reasons and any doubts: in short, being hit with the justification "too many parentheses" from a user who turns out to use them much more than I do definitely piqued my curiosity, and I thought it necessary to delve deeper; I believe that anyone leaving comments on DeB should also be prepared to accept everything, right? Otherwise, it would be a bit too easy. I also agree with you on the joking aspect (if you were to deepen your knowledge of my accounts on these pages, you would notice: of course, if I realize someone is being disrespectful, then joking doesn’t count anymore, but I believe that applies to everyone) but honestly, the tone of your negative review wasn’t "jokey" but quite serious, so I thought I’d adapt to the same mood, but without the bitterness that (reading between the lines of your last post) you attribute to me; rather (the score is there to demonstrate my good faith) only with the greatest possible assertiveness. I assure you that when I’m bitter, I don’t need to point it out, believe me ;-) Bye!

I quote Psycho: "nobody is untouchable," so not even the Beatles, but criticizing them on Scaruffian grounds only adds a bit of color now... How fleeting are these contemporary critics! ;-)

I have always preferred "The Stand" among his works anyway (and I know you'll "shoot me" for this) honestly, I think it has been truly overrated.