cptgaio

Anyway, indeed Flight 93 is the most controversial episode of the entire event; one thing is for sure: all the conspiracy theories so far have proven to be false and contradictory (to one another and when placed side by side). The fact that the truth has not yet been established does not mean it is the most illogical, right? Use common sense: if you were really organizing a conspiracy, would you leave all those alleged "evidences" (alleged because all disproven) that, among other things, imply an execution far more complicated than what would truly be necessary? Don’t you think?
And anyway, regarding Flight 93, all the urban legends spread by conspiracy theorists, lacking wreckage, witnesses, etc., have been proven false; isn't it more logical to think this rather than seeking (or fabricating) all the other far-fetched ideas?

aberration, not abberation...

@Pixies: are you reading this? undicisettembre: FAQ 5.1: Il Volo 93 - La “versione ufficiale”
Because it seems to me that the answers are more than sufficient to your doubts, then, I repeat, nothing is stronger than what one wants to believe in forcefully, so I don’t know what else to tell you.

@Katharsys: Well, let's not generalize now. I'm talking about a topic that goes beyond the dynamics of the site, and among other things, I am absolutely against the arguments that you and Psychocriptic are advocating. To be honest, if you hadn't brought me into this, I don't even think it would have been worth paying attention to, since in your case it’s not about logic or common sense, but rather an aberration of any civic and human sense. Ranting about the extermination of any people is not just worse than any conspiracy fixation, it is inhuman and uncivil. So at least until you return to reason, I have absolutely no intention of engaging with you. For the umpteenth time, as it seems to not be clear yet, denying any conspiracy theory regarding the issues at hand, unless objective evidence is provided (and so far, none has), does not mean supporting the Bush administration in the invasion of Afghanistan or Iraq, it does not mean denying the foreign policy mistakes made by the U.S. in the last 50 years of history, nor does it mean being politically aligned on one side or the other... it means insisting that history is not a collection of manipulated polaroids arranged to one's liking, but that investigating something requires scientific rigor and not easy sensationalism. I hope that's clear.

@Pixies: if you read the book I suggest in my first post, you will also find objective refutations to the theory you mention: there would also be information online, but for goodness' sake, I don't feel like rummaging through anymore; it's up to you to decide whether to trust it or not.

Do what you believe. My stance is based on logic and common sense; I don’t confuse politics with the laws of Physics, Chemistry, etc., as it seems you might be doing. Clear your mind a bit, then maybe we can talk. I’ve suggested the means; the rest is just chatter (yours). P.S: It's precisely because there are many innocent lives at stake that you should show some respect. Anyway, since you are so interested in the truth, I have a question: if you had to organize a conspiracy (without possibly getting caught), would you really have done it in the expensive and convoluted way (or rather, I should say ways, since among you conspiracy theorists you can't even agree and keep arguing about who has the most "interesting" version) that Mazzucco proposes, or wouldn't you have thought of it as it actually happened? Another thing, I don’t know if you proposed it or some other associate of yours, but in the list of "architects" mentioned above, there’s even someone suggesting that laser beams were used. Should I post links to all these things? Should I mention that Mazzucco also claims that the Earth is hollow and we live inside, that man never landed on the moon, and other conspiracies? Should I post links to those things too, or are you going to start making little man arguments instead of just mimicking me and turning the tables? (typical attitudes of someone with conspiracy syndrome)

Spot, classic conspiracy-theorist attitude: when you’re cornered, you try to turn the tables: it doesn’t work, sweetheart... come on, come on...

Ah, one last thing that just came to mind regarding someone who asked me why I "cowardly attack" Mazzucco: this is a little page where you can clearly understand who Mazzucco is: undicisettembre: Quod Erat Demonstrandum

undicisettembre: Facciamo il punto sulla termite
And now enough is enough, believe what you want, by now it doesn't matter much. I recommended a book to you, and you diverted the conversation by asking me about urban legends. I tried to steer the discussion towards logic and common sense, but you kept talking about those urban legends, posting links with videos from the same Mazzucco (of course, if you use the same sources to prove someone else's theories, I wouldn't want you as my lawyers...). You asked me for arguments on why I have a specific opinion of Mazzucco, and I believe I responded. I find it rather pointless (and those who know me on these pages know that I actually do this very rarely) to keep posting links when logic and common sense are enough, so I thank you for the interesting discussion and I conclude here. Haloa

Enough with this story about the steel pools, they didn't exist, plain and simple. How many times do I have to repeat it? The story of the termite is a proven hoax...