cptgaio

Last thing for Sertes: are you the same person mentioned in this article? Perle Complottiste: L'autodemolizione di Sertes I'm asking because if that's the case, so many things would be really clear to me...

But yes, Attivissimo talks about it (I posted the link somewhere above where there's even a photo of the smoke cloud, of course if you don’t check the links I post… anyway here it is Pagina non trovata all debunking sites discuss it (but I don’t feel like searching for them for you, since it’s clear you won’t check them) and I'm not pontificating, you are the one who can’t distinguish scientific foundations from metaphysical ones (it’s not about trusting sources, yours are incorrect, false or manipulated, plain and simple) and I repeat, continuing to insist on false and/or manipulated sources only serves to disprove your theses, is that better? Then if you say that article is anti-journalism, the problem is solely yours; if you can live with that, I certainly won’t try to change your mind. You brought up a name (shifting the boundaries of the conversation when you were asked not to) and those are the consequences; you should have thought about it before doing it. From my point of view, this discussion ended at least 70-80 posts ago (since you insist on things I’ve already answered) but if you keep dragging me into accusations of not dialoguing or being unserious, it’s you who are doing it. I believe I have demonstrated the opposite; of course, from your point of view that's not the case, you are one-directional: you’ve already decided what the truth is. Keep it and live happily. Period.

Alright, Ashanti happy you happy all, I also thank Alex for stopping by even though I find his comment bizarre. @Valerio: I don't have much time to read the things you propose, I promise I’ll do it as soon as possible. Hi everyone.

Guys (Sertes and Pixies), calm down and keep your cool, you're asking me questions, the same ones for 50 posts, to which I've already responded, and you're trying to make it seem like I haven't. Now, if I didn't know that this is the classic conspiratorial attitude, I would have already sent you somewhere: this is the ultimate proof of my willingness to engage in dialogue, it seems to me. And then Pixies, I'm not pushing anything as objective: the references I've posted are just that because they've been scientifically proven. Then I repeat, nothing is stronger than what one wants to believe, so if you want to believe it, go ahead. Peace, I've provided you with the tools to ensure that people like Mazzucco don't fool you, then it's up to you... One last thing and I'm saying it to both of you: avoid citing false and manipulated sources because it does not reflect well on you. Bye.

Ashanti, forgive me, but your argument doesn't hold: who tells you that those who came here haven't read it? Just because you've decided it's stuff for faux intellectuals? Regarding the "genesis of the arts," I invite you to explore further because you're off track and confusing: it's not about the "difficulty" of conceiving something but about the levels of communication enacted by something, and there the mechanisms are more similar than you think.

at stake, I don't dance...

Sertes, the matter is twofold: either you’re pretending to be clueless, or you’re genuinely clueless because you know perfectly well that I responded to the issue of the steel puddles, just as I did regarding your group of "architects for the truth." As for that sworn confession, what do you want me to say? Like everything you’ve said so far, it will either be an urban legend or a manipulation. I could even look for a suitable link (and I’m sure there is one), but what’s the point? You already have your own concept of truth in your head (typical of someone obsessed with conspiracy theory), and even if I slammed all the objectivity in this world in front of you, you wouldn’t let it go; the whole puddle story confirms this. At this point, I hope you’re just a fake trying to provoke me to see how long I can play along because otherwise, it’s concerning. Let’s play a little game, okay? I’ll concede (as they say in Naples...) and you stop dragging me into a fruitless dance, deal?

Enbar, not ebar...

Ashanti, darling, I promise not to make any more stupid jokes about your musical tastes, but in the future, try to avoid calling someone "fake cultured and fake refined" for appreciating things you don't grasp the depth of (that is, you allow yourself to call someone fake for appreciating Eco, while I can’t help but think that you are terribly superficial and tremendously fake-alternative just because you like the professional widow? You set the terms of the conversation, I simply adapted): your last comment is proof of that. Thank you for the clarification on the difference between art and art, but I'm afraid you're also making a huge mistake; all arts are sisters.
@Valerio: I find your arguments weak, but I won't insist on issues of pure liking/disliking, and correct me if I'm wrong, but when it comes to writing skills, I'm sorry, I’m inflexible: Eco is a master, plain and simple. Thanks also to ebar for the comment.

Of course you can no longer live without me! It’s true that a conspiracy theorist only makes sense if there are rational people to debunk their nonsense... I think I’ve posted it already anyway (A bit lengthy document, where all the errors of "Global Deception" are reported, but what interests you is in the second paragraph of the second chapter) 11/9 - Note a Inganno Globale Now seriously, if you don’t have serious things to discuss, I would kindly ask you to stop bringing me up (since I’ve already answered all your questions... they’re always the same from the first 10 posts...) because I don’t want to give further visibility to this video, which is an insult to the memory of so many innocent lives lost.