In the post above, thereâs an extra âpiù chiariâ... Anyway, I want to thank everyone so much for the compliments (always appreciated) and the comments. Iâll respond individually to those who raised questions:
@Ratman: when something goes beyond the artistic side (written in this case) and becomes a human heritage like this book, itâs inevitable that it happens; I wouldnât get too angry about it :-D
@Miramar: wrong or right when we talk about intrinsic tastes doesnât exist, so your vote, along with your reasoning, wouldnât have been a problem. Thank you for the compliment. @Franci! (the âoldâ Inarf I suppose...): no, itâs not childhood thatâs abnormal if one doesnât read it, but the reading of this book gives many useful insights for adulthood, which is undeniable; and anyway, read that sentence as a rhetorical figure ;-)
@Fedeee: Yes, the input was given to me by that episode, although I would have reviewed it sooner or later regardless. I'm sorry if my approach wasnât clear to you; I explain the probable reasons above. If you need clarifications on phrases or anything else from the review, feel free to ask without fear! @Bartle: I mention it one way or another in the review, but we are dealing with "tastes" here, so I wonât insist further ;-)
@Nosebleed: I explain the approach above; I thank you for the appreciation.
@Alex: honestly, itâs not a naive book; I assure you itâs extremely realistic in this sense: it should be seen as a reminder.
@Nickname: I donât see why you shouldnât write another one.
@Tomgil: thank you, you got the point. Thanks to Enbar, Green, Terry, Tele, Meta, Pourquoi, Barba (even! My "De-Adula...") Finnegan, and last but not least Fusi for stopping by. Bye.