cptgaio

The cover is really hideous! I don't know them and I don't think I'll delve deeper! Zot!

Really a beautiful book.

Of course, it's been a while since two anonymous users were "trolling" each other on DeB (it might be a sign that DeB is doing just fine, I’ll do some statistics... ;-) ). I'm stepping in just to clarify something regarding post 34 from one of the two anonymous users (for me, it could even be the same person behind it; it wouldn't be the first time that happens). It wasn't the editors who requested the removal of that post, but yours truly, and for once ;-) they listened to me, so take it out on me: after all, I'm just a damn moralizer, right?

There's an extra "delle" and then that "eran indirizzate" was meant to be "era indirizzata": the tiredness and the dysgraphia, sorry.

Ps: And I repeat, because sometimes it doesn’t hurt to emphasize, my intervention was just a personal reflection on comment 41 (or 40) from Easy and was not directed against any of the participants here, and surely not towards you (especially since, honestly, I hadn’t noticed your previous posts). Aloha.

Lux, with all due respect, you really didn’t get my post at all, not just the "poser" talk (and the irony made clear through the distorted use of the term "giovani"), so I’ll repeat the advice to reread it (don’t play these games with me, they don’t work, come on...). It’s true that everyone considers their own parameters to be good, and in fact, I wasn’t talking about that. I was saying that you only consider YOURS (and don't tell me that's not true or that we all do this, because that would be a lie) and anyway, good for you if you’ve started to "know how others think" (too bad that knowing doesn’t necessarily mean understanding). Then you’re free to despise whoever you want (just as you think I put the artistic side on the back burner... given the last sentence of your post), but I don’t think, to my recollection, that I’ve ever discussed that (you always do, for example), but I’m free to think that you’re overly influenced by "sociological" parameters (let’s call them that). If you’re okay with that, great; if not, I don’t know what to do about it: think what you like, in short. One last thing, to clarify: the "poser" discourse, which was purely hypothetical, means that often the risk of being one without realizing it (perhaps by pointing fingers at others) is real, and the example of the "Brondi effect" reinforced my hypothesis. This is obviously my subjective opinion. Peace.

No, don’t wait that long! ;-)

I missed this one: a brief but heartfelt review. The film does not do justice to the character.

Beautiful review, epoch-making film machelodicoafa?

Certo, invia pure il testo e procederò con la traduzione.