Grasshopper

DeRank ™: 5,88

DeAge™ : 7973 days • Here since 11 august 2004

Peter Gabriel Ovo

12 oct 05

Voto:

As I mentioned in the comments on "So," your judgment is beautiful because it is passionate, even if it doesn't say much about the musical content of the album, which (incredible) I don't know. It's the only Peter Gabriel album I don't have, but from the way you talk about it, it seems like a gap that needs filling.

Peter Gabriel So

11 oct 05

Voto:

That idiot who can only talk about feet. Call it Foot revenge, Fetor, or whatever you like, it’s still the same thing. But now let me go, or it really looks like we’re in love!

Peter Gabriel So

11 oct 05

Voto:

P.S. (always to Mariaelena) Follow Sylvian's advice, so I won't be forced to write brief notes about the Universe. From my roughly 70 reviews, you can get a good idea of my tastes. Anyway, we'll talk again, with the permission of Dr. Scholl's.

Peter Gabriel So

11 oct 05

Voto:

I greet you. See you tomorrow Marialelena. I also say hello to our Dr.Scholl's - Foot Revenge - Cupido, who from the talks he gives really seems to think with his feet, given that he always has them in his mouth. Or is he just a poor fetishist? Who knows, it's his business.

Peter Gabriel So

11 oct 05

Voto:

Mariaelena, what you are asking me is like "Brief Notes on the Universe". I want to point out that I’m at work (what am I waiting for to get Internet at home?) and I have already performed miracles, dodging the glares of the bosses, to maintain this exchange of views. For now, let’s settle for Peter Gabriel.

Peter Gabriel So

11 oct 05

Voto:

Really, more than love, a real mess has broken out: a series of misunderstandings worthy of a Jack Lemmon & Walter Matthau film. Anyway, it's clear that although we can’t help misunderstanding each other, I, Mariaelena, Sylvian, and Massimof feel very similarly about Peter Gabriel and sensitivity.

Peter Gabriel So

11 oct 05

Voto:

To Mariaelena: if you are 37 years old and you have preserved these bursts of enthusiasm (for Peter Gabriel or anything else) so pure and "without ifs and buts," you deserve all the compliments. Objectivity might suffer a little, but in return, life is better. I’ll tell you that behind my mask of a reviewer striving to be as precise and impersonal as possible, I also hold onto quite a few of them.

Peter Gabriel So

11 oct 05

Voto:

Perhaps there has been more than one misunderstanding: there are four of us conversing with another who can be anyone of the other three. At this point, I will be pedantic and point out that the last message (before this one) was addressed to sylvian1982.

Peter Gabriel So

11 oct 05

Voto:

There was a misunderstanding: regarding the age, I was replying to Mariaelena (since she tends to ask "what year are you from"), while I was only asking you about the message and the review. Another misunderstanding: I thought a review of yours on Peter Gabriel was coming and feared it was about "So". Better this way. Anyway, I'm glad there's another "child of the boom" (as they call us born in the '60s) on Debaser. With all the classics we know, considering our venerable age, we can make a great contribution. Can you believe I thought from your nickname that you were born in '82...