R10455662

I almost forgot.

I'm here too! I want it.

what a beautiful page! but why only 3 stars if it was so lovely? This musical reality fascinates me, I don’t know it at all… anyway, I really liked the review, firstly for how it's written, and secondly because I have a soft spot for the piano and for the Russians ;)

Well done Ghem, lovely inviting review! They actually intrigue me. We'll see!

I haven’t listened to this album, but I enjoyed the first two, even though they don’t blow me away. However, I saw them live in a truly evocative place (on the terrace of a castle tower in Benevento) and it was really intense. I didn’t even know them that well back then, but their live performance captivated me quite a lot. He’s also really nice besides being very good-looking ;D

very very interesting. Nice review

Beautiful, I was about to send my (review of this album). I bought it too for 4.90 euros about 7 years ago, but I've only listened to it these days (!!!). I also want to recommend it. "Let me sleep beside you" you could've mentioned though!! It's stunning. "Sell me a coat" is my favorite :D ('cause I feel cold). I don't know what rating to give to the review.

umpf

I support the controversies but appreciate the reviewer's response. However, it's also true that: Der Blutharsch are total crap, most of the other representatives of neo-folk are decadent NECROPHILES who for 20 years have been pushing the same absolutely unacceptable and unconvincing themes since they talk so much about fighting, and struggle and struggle, but since they don’t confront themselves, they wage a war (in words, but words are important among beings capable of articulation) against others and seek a Faith that doesn’t personally compromise them ("seeking" is already generous on my part), and in the end (as is normal, given that they’ve taken the wrong path) they don’t even resolve anything; will they continue to whine for life? No, because there isn’t a shred of sincerity in their "struggle", but they make it seem so. Then there's Douglas Pierce (Pearce? Death in June, in short, whom I appreciated a lot many years ago) who should be taken for what he is, namely a psychopath, and so after a while it’s better to let it go, as long as you can read the lyrics in an existentialist key it can pass, but after a while you have to force yourself too much because in the end he has lost it, so why follow him? Finally, I would say it’s better to listen to Lou Reed singing about how beautiful it is to shoot heroin but then singing pom pom pom satellite of love (managing, among other things, to break my heart in both cases), rather than these schizophrenics who sing explicit hatred or, even worse, sing songs of hatred MASKED as love songs, of "noble" (and deleterious) ideals. Because in the end, quietly, these things pollute the soul, and sometimes it’s not enough to be aware to tear the veils from one’s eyes, whether they are of false kindness, moralism, or carefully justified explicit malice. Sorry, maybe it’s better to keep quiet and come off as fools rather than open one’s mouth and remove all doubt, but right now this is what I think and I feel like saying it.

What is it? Sorry for the inappropriate harshness, but I don’t know. I give it two because I agree that starting from this one is a way to get to know Cave. But honestly, it’s my favorite and the review is pointless, if not downright annoying.