dark schneider

"they made them famous" - (?). "There's also the usual ballad of the band, now fond of this kind of hard-melodic sounds, "The Animal In Me," which, however, is enjoyable as it is not the classic diabetic and hyperglycemic rock ballad, but a delicious semi-ballad that manages to engage the listener." - perhaps a re-reading now and then wouldn't hurt. I just want to add one thing. Good or bad, the reviews of reunited bands are more or less at the level of harsh criticism or decency. But isn’t it that, in the end, we all find ourselves a bit reluctant to admit the value of a new album? Isn’t it that we approach such works with a certain prejudice, maybe after such a long time since the last one? I'm not saying that the works of reunited bands are masterpieces, but a bit of decorum, right? Anatas, this is not a critique of you, just a general observation from my point of view.

"From those studio sessions came 22 tracks." - Couldn't they afford to release a double album? Too little money? Those "shits" (as you called them) the Guns did the same thing as these Germans (whom I also adore), but these guys are heroes. This means not being critical at all and starting with preconceived notions about any artist! Then you can't tell me that Rammstein delivered a five-star duo while the Guns were pathetic with the two Use Your Illusion. As Mughini would say: "Come on...COME ON!!!!!!" Album rating: 3.5 but I round up: better this than Reise, Reise from my point of view.

DeBaser is not just made of beautiful things; shit exists too, and it certainly does... The reviewer, for instance, a human case already highlighted by OLEEINAR, turns out to be part of this shit that, pretending to be a critic, prefers to give 5 to every album by Muse and tear apart—not a masterpiece, but not even a piece of trash—an album that is actually more like an EP than a full album. I would say that, whether we like it or not, Guns 'n Roses are part of every (and I mean every) person who approaches the world of rock. Whoever wants to trash them like that piece of shit of a star mentioned is just a poor hypocrite. How do you think today’s kids approach the world of rock? With Tokyo Hotel and their like. What will they do when they discover the real sacred monsters? It's hard to say, but I certainly hope they will have a bit more objectivity than a poor derelict like this Shitblazer. It's clear that if the shit offered today by MTV and its ilk is of such low quality, there will be a reevaluation of past genres that I eagerly await. As time goes by, I increasingly miss those idiots from Limp, the badass attitude of Blink182..., compared to those cushy, cringeworthy Germans of today.

Okay, but you know there are also synonyms for beautiful. Then again, getting all wrapped up in it is really almost unbearable in a review. No hard feelings, just different perspectives. I'll try to look for the singles because, in the end, you’ve got me curious.

@Bartleboom comm. n.3: Of course you're right, but reviewing those movies is like reviewing a CD by Ramazzotti or Marco Carta. There are also those. A very nice movie, but not exceptional. In 2 years, Al Pacino will be Tony Montana...

I would go for "Best Friend," a fantastic lesbian film, and for "Tokyo Private Police," an erotic cartoon parody of Patlabor, the animated series of "robot mechs"...

A MERIT: that there is no track by track and a nice intro. A FAULT: too bad that the intro is the review itself.

Man began to pollute from the very first time he took a shit...

"wedding ceremony" - what is the ceremony of Nunzio? I'm sorry, but just for this, I’m taking away 1 point from your final grade (wedding ceremony). Anyway, I agree with Bartleboom by pointing out that the true oriental masterpieces reside in porn films where there is less focus on carnality compared to Western ones and more on erotic fantasy itself, as well as in cartoons, which are more geared towards adult themes.

A heartfelt and coherent letter despite the digressions for one of the geniuses of modern music. Trent Reznor.