Stalinslao

DeRank : 0,53 • DeAge™ : 4925 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 16 february 2012
Your comment on the chart

Comments on this chart
  • Taxirider
    20 feb 12
    But Lenin, Stalin, Lukàcs, Mao, and Enver Hoxha?
     
  • Danny The Kid
    20 feb 12
    there would also be a certain Lev Trotsky...
     
  • Taxirider
    20 feb 12
    Yes, but for hammering:-) I don’t think that good Stanislaus is a fan of his.
     
  • Danny The Kid
    20 feb 12
    just for that!
     
  • Stalinslao
    20 feb 12
    Trotsky is a reactionary bourgeois and enemy of the proletariat.
    This is a music ranking on a music site; discussing great avant-gardes of the proletariat in this context is a bourgeois practice that I disdain.
    Anyway, I forget Marx, Engels, Tito (despite his mistakes), Castro, Ho Chi Minh, Brezhnev, and other great revolutionary heroes.
     
  • Taxirider
    20 feb 12
    What, what? Tito the crypto-fascist who tried to communistize the republican socialization? Castro the bourgeois supported by the barbudos ex-Peronist Guevara? Ho Chi Minh who was on the payroll of the social-imperialism of the revisionist and anti-Stalinist USSR? The only one who, IN PART, is somewhat redeemable is Brezhnev. But are you sure you're feeling okay tonight?
     
  • Taxirider
    20 feb 12
    After today’s speech I've made my decision: I stand with the PMLI, the only true party that is the heir to Marxism-Leninism and the thought of Mao. The masters are: 1) Marx 2) Engels 3) Lenin 4) Stalin 5) Mao. Great is the good Pol Pot and only initially Enver Hoxa (who later betrayed the m-l ideal). Trotsky, Bukharin, Luxemburg, Bordiga, Gramsci, Khrushchev, Tito, the GDR, Ceausescu, Ho Chi Minh, Deng, Kim Il Sung, and the cowardly Eurocommunists like Berlinguer ARE A-L-L revisionists, anti-communists, and in the pay of the bourgeois “left.”
     
  • Stalinslao
    20 feb 12
    Your words are revisionist chatter; Tito's great mistake was to try to distance himself from the motherly embrace of the Soviet Union, but the peculiarity of the Yugoslav land partially excuses him, and his struggle against fascism and Nazism is undeniable. Castro, on the other hand, willingly accepted Soviet support against U.S. imperialism. I share the criticisms of Guevara, but certainly not the one accusing him of being Peronist. Ho Chi Minh taught terror to the Americans, and that is enough. The good people's commissioner must learn to accept errors, which are human, for the good of the Party, and despite their mistakes, these are men who serve the Party to spread the revolutionary cause.
     
  • Stalinslao
    20 feb 12
    Compagna Taxireder, I understand your revolutionary ardor, but you must realize that certain judgments should be taken with due caution and only after being approved by a people's tribunal and the Party organ. That said, I share much of your judgments with the exception of: Gramsci (although this may perhaps be dictated by that bourgeois tendency to defend a fellow countryman, for which I make amends and self-criticism), Tito (a comrade who makes mistakes), and Ho Chi Min, from whom we must learn the guerrilla strategies that defeated American imperialism.
     
  • matteodi.leonar
    20 feb 12
    "Red Army calls you...". Well, it's in my personal file. But David Sylvian wrote it, not me.
     
  • Taxirider
    20 feb 12
    Comrade Stalinsalo: I understand certain historical and aesthetic fascinations. But Marxism-Leninism as thought by Mao is a science and not an opinion or a romantic infatuation. Tito fought the fascists, YES, BUT AT THAT TIME HE WAS A STALINIST. When he broke away from Joseph Stalin, in fact, he resurrected some national-syndicalist and republican fascist theories like workers' self-management. This must occur ONLY AND EXCLUSIVELY under the control of the Communist Party. Ho Chi Minh was right to defend himself against the Americans, and I'm glad he killed those damned imperialists. However, his men attacked A GENUINE SOCIALIST COUNTRY: the Democratic Kampuchea of the comrade, and man of peace, Saloth Sar known as Pol Pot.
     
  • Taxirider
    20 feb 12
    Fidel Castro was a bourgeois who loved to read the biography of the Spanish fascist Jose Antonio Primo De Rivera. His Sovietism, it’s worth remembering, was NOT Stalinist BUT REVISIONIST (pro-Khrushchev). Guevara, being Argentine, came from the Peronist "left" (something like Fiamma Tricolore but without the obsession with the Jews). Furthermore, his activity as a poet often led him close to unacceptable utopian deviations for a true Marxist-Leninist. Gramsci, on the other hand, was a theorist of the childish "ordinovismo" (deprecated by Lenin) and of a bourgeois path to "socialism," a path based on the counter-revolutionary concept of "hegemony." Revolution is not a gala dinner! Anyway, I will present everything to the Central Committee and discuss it with Comrade Scuderi. Red and socialist greetings.
     
  • Stalinslao
    21 feb 12
    Well done, comrade Taxirider, I am pleased with what you write. I see that social-democratic and counter-revolutionary propaganda has not taken root with you. I agree with what you say, especially about the social-democrat Guevara, whom we willingly leave as an icon for the bourgeois pseudo-revolutionaries. The Party first! I hope you forgive my attempt to deceive you, but as you well know, a people's commissioner must resort to even petty means to flush out the social-democrats hiding within the ranks of the Revolution, and I have already uncovered some. My report will be more than positive.
     
  • Taxirider
    21 feb 12
    Great and thorough explanation, comrade Stalinslao! With the five masters, we will win! Long live Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin, and Mao! We are the party of resurgence; down with the servants of the bourgeoisie. Revisionists and reformists: our red sun will sweep them away. Ignite the hearts, call to the struggle, united, red, and socialist Italy! Come with us, let’s unite the class; revolution will then triumph!
     
  • Taxirider
    25 feb 12
    Comrade Stalinsalo: I have resigned from the PMLI as a sectarian party and, to put it with Vladimir Lenin, extremely immaturely childish. Now I have approached the constituent reality of Communists-Popular Left alongside the comrade and true Marxist-Leninist Marco Rizzo. Boxer, lover of the Clash and alleged redskin. I have also re-evaluated the more mature Gramsci and understood the immense difficulties in which comrade Togliatti found himself after the war. Long live Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin, Kim Il Sung, Gramsci, and MARCO RIZZO! AH, EVEN JESSICA!
     
  • matteowolf
    30 mar 12
    this is officially the craziest page on the web
     
  • Mike76
    30 mar 12
    Nothing to argue about the ranking, but I must correct my fellow Taxirider for the defamatory comment regarding the memory of the Dear Uncle Ho. When the peaceful Democratic Kampuchea was invaded by the Socialist Republic of Vietnam for reasons that have nothing to do with socialist ideals, Bác Hồ had already been mummified and residing in the mausoleum of Hanoi for almost ten years. It is extremely wrong to attribute the faults of his successors to him.
     
Similar users
hjhhjij

DeRank: 15,26

Sempresolointer

DeRank: 0,08

Lostinspace

DeRank: 2,97

Workhorse

DeRank: 6,75

Danny The Kid

DeRank: 7,13

Hetzer

DeRank: 5,59

Don_Pollo

DeRank: 3,42

Darkeve

DeRank: 6,65

Belghazi

DeRank: 1,83

Marcot95

DeAge 4199

Tags 1/1
#