One of the most overrated albums of all time, considered by many to be one of the best pop punk records, instead turns out to be one of the most irritating ever.

Perhaps the only thing that stands out is the drummer, but couldn't you have gone somewhere else?

12 "songs" that represent absolutely nothing, maybe 1 or 2 are worth salvaging.

"Dumpweed" and "Don't Leave Me" are nice songs, fast and rhythmic, where at some points the drummer gives his best, but these two songs alone are not enough for me to endorse this album.

I absolutely hate Tom's voice; it is nothing short of unbearable. Mark manages more or less, and is definitely better than his colleague, although that wasn't very difficult.

The drummer, as I have already mentioned, is very good, but it's a pity that everything else is mediocre and irritating.

The spontaneous question that comes to mind is, how did this album achieve so much success? Besides the singles, have people even listened to half of the songs on this album?

The singles, "What's My Age Again" and "Adam's Song," are identical. Both start with a sweet and slow guitar, and the middle part after the second chorus is always slow, with the drums always keeping the same rhythm.

Perhaps the only single that stands out is "All the Small Things," even though the middle part is always slow, but how original are we....

In conclusion, if you like pop punk, avoid this album and listen to "Dookie" by Green Day or even "Kerplunk" wasn't bad at all, actually..... in conclusion, it's a fail, to be thrown away.


Loading comments  slowly