It's always a big, enormous, false problem. It's a problem reducing oneself to social "withdrawal" (I take up the post by @[IlConte]) because (de facto) alienated from the reality of things, in turn reducing what is outside of us to the level of a confused ideology that does not represent reality at all (see "right" and "left" in the terms understood by Bourgeois Representative Democracy). The ambiguous figures who define themselves as anti-capitalists (like @[Hank Monk]) are a problem too, as it's never clear how committed they are or what they're really doing, when they make grand statements only to finally position themselves as reformists or even renounce their right-leaning views, while claiming that every "progressivism" is a child of turbo-capitalism. As if the ridiculous closure of those """socialisms""" that always end up being purely social-democratic (see the socialisms of the 21st century) were what ought to be opposed to capitalism. The truth is that SOCIAL FREEDOMS have never truly gone against individual liberation by principle, and today, the moment has come to liberate everyone, rather than end up like the old real socialisms that only liberated the "structure" or just a part of the discriminated social categories (like women, whom socialism first came to aid, even the utopian kind).
"The Damage above the hill remains fixed and the essence is this":
Me exploited and the other exploited, a single entity. Those who are not exploited can decide, but above all, I and the other exploited are we the exploited, a single thing, a single entity. Understanding this necessity of liberation, even if not sufficient. Organizing, getting to work among ourselves in intermediate struggles can be the beginning of class self-sufficiency. Other things, other discussions do not exist and if they do exist, they are useless. There is nothing else to discuss.

Alfredo Bandelli - La caccia alle streghe (La violenza)