•
Rating: On September 11, 2001, after long preparation, the USA attacked itself: while the most important figures of the civilian and military aviation, as well as the control apparatus, are new to the position or even absent, some drones invisible to radar – that mysteriously disappeared, just like the fighter jets decimated that day due to a series of scheduled exercises – hijacked planes whose black boxes would remain secret, offering the authorities the pretext to spectacularly bring down the Twin Towers, filled with dynamite in the weeks prior under the pretext of necessary work to remove the enormous quantity of asbestos that characterized them, and they didn't even forget to declare war on themselves in the most explicit way, sending something very similar to a missile against the Pentagon.
This is the thesis of Massimo Mazzucco, associated with the site Luogocomune.net, who for years has been fighting against debunkers worldwide about 9/11, supported by associations of physicists, architects, and engineers from England, America, and Italy determined to dismantle the official thesis. The documentary, lasting five hours, is divided into sections, very schematic. It begins with a long parallel between 9/11 and Pearl Harbor (the reference is to the document on the New American Century, where the clique of Rumsfeld and Cheney proclaimed the need for a "Pearl Harbor" of great impact on the masses to allow the USA a new, vast military mobilization: Enduring Freedom?); it correctly presents all the reasons given by debunkers in support of their own theories close to the magazine "Popular Mechanics," presenting various videos with Paolo Attivissimo and other brilliant protagonists of the business in question, offering in total an enormous amount of documents to reflect on. The question posed is the following: could a state whose leadership over the twentieth century imposed itself through deception – just think of the casus belli of the Gulf of Tonkin for Vietnam, Brzezinski's idea of "giving the USSR its own Vietnam" with provocations deliberately risen on the Soviet-Afghan border, or the absurdities brought out just to attack Iraq – have been able to hide thousands of data on what remains of the victims, on the movements of the alleged hijackers in airports studded with cameras on the fateful day, or on the black boxes? And communicate intentionally and blatantly false news about high-altitude phone calls with the plane in a dive, about radars, and about the hijackers' skills? Mazzucco answers yes, without doubts. Some legends related to that tragic day, whose dead were immediately called "martyrs" by the authorities, are today debunked by the authorities themselves: like the famous "Let's roll," which suggested a patriotic song to Neil Young.
Of course, the thesis has its holes here and there. For example, one might wonder where the dead from the planes ended up, or why, if indeed there was an exchange between a drone and passenger plane on flight 93 (a CIA plan already prepared in the 1960s), the drone would then be exploded (which is evident, given the fragments scattered even several kilometers from the area where it supposedly crashed), even though it is claimed it crashed. In his life, Mazzucco has proposed many interpretations of historical and physical facts that are hard to accept or outright improbable. But we cannot, it would not be logical, deny a conspiracy solely for these reasons. Other arguments must be sought, and perhaps the authorities' silences deserve certain suspicions, which would lead to the idea of an internal coup conducted by the right wing of the Republican Party in agreement with certain Intelligence sectors to help the oil industry, the reconstruction (partly in Cheney's hands), and for the strategic aftermath that the expansion of the American sphere of influence in the Great Game area would bring in an anti-Russian and anti-Chinese function.
In short, It's a frame, as whispered on the phone, before having to attack, CeeCee Lyles, a flight attendant, among the victims of what for Mazzucco is a hijacking with an exchange between drone and airplane (specifically flight 93, which crashed into an unlikely small pit in Pennsylvania)?
In other words: was it a staging?
Loading comments slowly
