Larrok

DeRank ™: 5,57

DeAge™ : 7250 days • Here since 5 august 2006

Children of Bodom Blooddrunk

29 jun 08

Voto:

Prog87, in my opinion, Children of Bodom are not a mediocre band; they really suck. Poor quality music, plain and simple. End of discussion. This is one of those countless useless power groups (if there are any power bands worth listening to at all). I even saw them live, unfortunately, at a festival, and they only confirmed my belief. The paradigm of uselessness made band.

Stone Sour Come What(ever) May

29 jun 08

Voto:

Well...great album, what a load of nonsense...sorry, "Through Glass" is an outrageous cheesefest...and off we go with session musicians and clichéd, hyper-produced songs...keep it up, yay!

Muse Showbiz

28 jun 08

Voto:

Yes, in fact "Awake" is the furthest thing from grunge you could think of... always keeping in mind that the term grunge means everything and nothing at the same time...

Muse Showbiz

28 jun 08

Voto:

A modest start... too bad they gradually went downhill until reaching the disgusting mess "Black Holes and Revelations"... just a tad too theatrical and over the top. There are some good snippets here and there, good "Muscle Museum" and "Cave", as well as the closing track and the title track. The next album is at the same level but even more inflated and exaggerated.

Dire Straits Making movies

28 jun 08

Voto:

I have never liked them; I find them cold and expressionless. For heaven's sake, great technical skill from Knopfler, but I find nothing interesting...

Blue Öyster Cult Some Enchanted Evening (2007 Remasters)

28 jun 08

Voto:

"That it is possible to be on par with the LZ, but not with the Motorhead." ----- When I read certain phrases, I don't know whether to laugh or cry... is it not possible to be on par with the Motorhead? Well, if you mean that it's impossible to be so useless, mediocre, and predictable, then we can agree. I hope you misspoke and didn't mean what it seems...

The Rolling Stones The Rolling Stones, Now!

28 jun 08

Voto:

Alex, I'm sorry to reopen the issue, but saying that the Stones are the most important band in history seems like a stretch to me... they have made great albums (and some, like "Exile," I adore), that's true, but their importance and innovation are confined to the 1960s in terms of stage presence, giving a new impetus to blues, providing a different interpretation... but in terms of innovation, there are contemporaries who clearly outshine them! Just think of Zappa, Beefheart, Velvet Underground, the early Pink Floyd, 13th Floor Elevators, Red Crayola, Tim Buckley... and I’ll stop with the '60s without going further...

Sergio Martino Acapulco, prima spiaggia a sinistra

27 jun 08

Voto:

Safe travels

Sergio Martino Acapulco, prima spiaggia a sinistra

27 jun 08

Voto:

Yes Poletti, I noticed that there’s a fake pretending to be you, but the cancer wish was indeed made by you in comment 108 and for this you should be banned, not for other nonsense.